Optimal commitment in an open economy: Credibility vs. flexibility

S.C.W. Eijffinger, E. Schaling

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

242 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using a graphical method, a new way of determining the optimal degree of central bank conservativeness is developed in this paper. Unlike Lohmann (1992) and Rogoff (1985a), we are able to express the upper and lower bounds of the interval containing the optimal degree of conservativeness in terms of the structural parameters of the model. Next, we show that optimal central bank independence is higher, the higher the natural rate of unemployment, the greater the benefits of unanticipated inflation, the less inflation-averse society, the smaller the variance of productivity shocks, the smaller real exchange rate variability and the smaller the openness of the economy. These propositions are tested for nineteen industrial countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States) for the Bretton-Woods period and after (1960-1993). In testing the model we employ a latent variables method (LISREL) in order to distinguish between actual and optimal monetary regimes.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUnknown Publisher
Number of pages34
Volume1995-79
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume1995-79

Keywords

  • Central Banks
  • Credibility
  • Independence
  • monetary economics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal commitment in an open economy: Credibility vs. flexibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Eijffinger, S. C. W., & Schaling, E. (1995). Optimal commitment in an open economy: Credibility vs. flexibility. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 1995-79). Unknown Publisher.