Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimisation of healthcare contracts: Tensions between standardisation and innovation: Comment on competition in healthcare: Good, bad or ugly?

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorScientificpeer-review

Abstract

An important determinant of health system performance is contracting. Providers often respond to financial incentives, despite the ethical underpinnings of medicine, and payers can craft contracts to influence performance. Yet contracting is highly imperfect in both single-payer and multi-payer health systems. Arguably, in a competitive, multi-payer environment, contractual innovation may occur more rapidly than in a single-payer system. This innovation in contract design could enhance performance. However, contractual innovation often fails to improve performance as payer incentives are misaligned with public policy objectives. Numerous countries seek to improve healthcare contracts, but thus far no health system has demonstrably crafted the necessary blend of incentives to stimulate optimal contracting.
Original languageEnglish
Article number9
Pages (from-to)121-123
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • healthcare
  • competition
  • contracts
  • innovation
  • performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimisation of healthcare contracts: Tensions between standardisation and innovation: Comment on competition in healthcare: Good, bad or ugly?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this