Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities

B. Nooteboom

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

239 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using insights from ‘embodied cognition’ and a resulting ‘cognitive theory of the firm’, I aim to contribute to the further development of evolutionary theory of organizations, in the specification of organizations as ‘interactors’ that carry organizational competencies as ‘replicators’, within industries as ‘populations’. Especially, I analyze how, if at all, ‘dynamic capabilities’ can be fitted into evolutionary theory. I propose that the prime purpose of an organization is to serve as a cognitive ‘focusing device’. Here, cognition has a wide meaning, including perception, interpretation, sense making, and value judgements. I analyse how this yields organizations as cohesive wholes, and differences within and between industries. I propose the following sources of variation: replication in communication, novel combinations of existing knowledge, and a path of discovery by which exploitation leads to exploration. These yield a proposal for dynamic capabilities. I discuss in what sense, and to what extent these sources of variation are ‘blind’, as postulated in evolutionary theory.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherOrganization
Number of pages23
Volume2007-2
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2007-2

Fingerprint

Dynamic capabilities
Cognition
Evolutionary theory
Industry
Theory of the firm
Replication
Communication
Exploitation
Competency
Sensemaking
Value judgements

Keywords

  • evolutionary economics
  • organization
  • cognition
  • dynamic capabilities

Cite this

Nooteboom, B. (2007). Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2007-2). Tilburg: Organization.
Nooteboom, B. / Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities. Tilburg : Organization, 2007. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{87738ef176f443d2a4e82bc285666e82,
title = "Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities",
abstract = "Using insights from ‘embodied cognition’ and a resulting ‘cognitive theory of the firm’, I aim to contribute to the further development of evolutionary theory of organizations, in the specification of organizations as ‘interactors’ that carry organizational competencies as ‘replicators’, within industries as ‘populations’. Especially, I analyze how, if at all, ‘dynamic capabilities’ can be fitted into evolutionary theory. I propose that the prime purpose of an organization is to serve as a cognitive ‘focusing device’. Here, cognition has a wide meaning, including perception, interpretation, sense making, and value judgements. I analyse how this yields organizations as cohesive wholes, and differences within and between industries. I propose the following sources of variation: replication in communication, novel combinations of existing knowledge, and a path of discovery by which exploitation leads to exploration. These yield a proposal for dynamic capabilities. I discuss in what sense, and to what extent these sources of variation are ‘blind’, as postulated in evolutionary theory.",
keywords = "evolutionary economics, organization, cognition, dynamic capabilities",
author = "B. Nooteboom",
note = "Pagination: 23",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "2007-2",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Organization",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Organization",

}

Nooteboom, B 2007 'Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2007-2, Organization, Tilburg.

Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities. / Nooteboom, B.

Tilburg : Organization, 2007. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2007-2).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities

AU - Nooteboom, B.

N1 - Pagination: 23

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Using insights from ‘embodied cognition’ and a resulting ‘cognitive theory of the firm’, I aim to contribute to the further development of evolutionary theory of organizations, in the specification of organizations as ‘interactors’ that carry organizational competencies as ‘replicators’, within industries as ‘populations’. Especially, I analyze how, if at all, ‘dynamic capabilities’ can be fitted into evolutionary theory. I propose that the prime purpose of an organization is to serve as a cognitive ‘focusing device’. Here, cognition has a wide meaning, including perception, interpretation, sense making, and value judgements. I analyse how this yields organizations as cohesive wholes, and differences within and between industries. I propose the following sources of variation: replication in communication, novel combinations of existing knowledge, and a path of discovery by which exploitation leads to exploration. These yield a proposal for dynamic capabilities. I discuss in what sense, and to what extent these sources of variation are ‘blind’, as postulated in evolutionary theory.

AB - Using insights from ‘embodied cognition’ and a resulting ‘cognitive theory of the firm’, I aim to contribute to the further development of evolutionary theory of organizations, in the specification of organizations as ‘interactors’ that carry organizational competencies as ‘replicators’, within industries as ‘populations’. Especially, I analyze how, if at all, ‘dynamic capabilities’ can be fitted into evolutionary theory. I propose that the prime purpose of an organization is to serve as a cognitive ‘focusing device’. Here, cognition has a wide meaning, including perception, interpretation, sense making, and value judgements. I analyse how this yields organizations as cohesive wholes, and differences within and between industries. I propose the following sources of variation: replication in communication, novel combinations of existing knowledge, and a path of discovery by which exploitation leads to exploration. These yield a proposal for dynamic capabilities. I discuss in what sense, and to what extent these sources of variation are ‘blind’, as postulated in evolutionary theory.

KW - evolutionary economics

KW - organization

KW - cognition

KW - dynamic capabilities

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2007-2

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities

PB - Organization

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Nooteboom B. Organization, Evolution, Cognition and Dynamic Capabilities. Tilburg: Organization. 2007. (CentER Discussion Paper).