Out-of-category brand imitation: Product categorization determines copycat evaluation

F. van Horen, Rik Pieters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Copycat brands imitate the trade dress of other brands, such as their brand name, logo, and packaging design. Copycats typically operate in the core product category of the imitated brand under the assumption that such “in-category imitation” is most effective. In contrast, four experiments demonstrate the benefits of “out-of-category imitation” for copycats, and the harmful effect on the imitated brand. Copycats are evaluated more positively in a related category, because consumers appraise the similarity between copycat and imitated brand more positively than in the core category, independent of the perceived similarity itself. This is due to a reduced salience of norms regarding imitation in the related category. Moreover, the results show a damaging backlash effect of out-of-category imitation on the general evaluation of the imitated brand and on its key perceived product attributes. The findings replicate across student, MTurk, and representative consumer samples; multiple product categories; and forms of brand imitation. This research demonstrates that out-of-category brand imitation helps copycat brands and hurts national leading brands much more than has so far been considered, which has managerial and public policy implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)816-832
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume44
Issue number4
Early online dateApr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

imitation
evaluation
Imitation
Evaluation
brand name
public policy
experiment

Keywords

  • product imitation
  • copycats
  • categorization
  • similarity

Cite this

@article{73dfbe80ba0e45fa89f01fa88f670810,
title = "Out-of-category brand imitation: Product categorization determines copycat evaluation",
abstract = "Copycat brands imitate the trade dress of other brands, such as their brand name, logo, and packaging design. Copycats typically operate in the core product category of the imitated brand under the assumption that such “in-category imitation” is most effective. In contrast, four experiments demonstrate the benefits of “out-of-category imitation” for copycats, and the harmful effect on the imitated brand. Copycats are evaluated more positively in a related category, because consumers appraise the similarity between copycat and imitated brand more positively than in the core category, independent of the perceived similarity itself. This is due to a reduced salience of norms regarding imitation in the related category. Moreover, the results show a damaging backlash effect of out-of-category imitation on the general evaluation of the imitated brand and on its key perceived product attributes. The findings replicate across student, MTurk, and representative consumer samples; multiple product categories; and forms of brand imitation. This research demonstrates that out-of-category brand imitation helps copycat brands and hurts national leading brands much more than has so far been considered, which has managerial and public policy implications.",
keywords = "product imitation, copycats, categorization, similarity",
author = "{van Horen}, F. and Rik Pieters",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/jcr/ucx065",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "816--832",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "4",

}

Out-of-category brand imitation : Product categorization determines copycat evaluation. / van Horen, F.; Pieters, Rik.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, 12.2017, p. 816-832.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Out-of-category brand imitation

T2 - Product categorization determines copycat evaluation

AU - van Horen, F.

AU - Pieters, Rik

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Copycat brands imitate the trade dress of other brands, such as their brand name, logo, and packaging design. Copycats typically operate in the core product category of the imitated brand under the assumption that such “in-category imitation” is most effective. In contrast, four experiments demonstrate the benefits of “out-of-category imitation” for copycats, and the harmful effect on the imitated brand. Copycats are evaluated more positively in a related category, because consumers appraise the similarity between copycat and imitated brand more positively than in the core category, independent of the perceived similarity itself. This is due to a reduced salience of norms regarding imitation in the related category. Moreover, the results show a damaging backlash effect of out-of-category imitation on the general evaluation of the imitated brand and on its key perceived product attributes. The findings replicate across student, MTurk, and representative consumer samples; multiple product categories; and forms of brand imitation. This research demonstrates that out-of-category brand imitation helps copycat brands and hurts national leading brands much more than has so far been considered, which has managerial and public policy implications.

AB - Copycat brands imitate the trade dress of other brands, such as their brand name, logo, and packaging design. Copycats typically operate in the core product category of the imitated brand under the assumption that such “in-category imitation” is most effective. In contrast, four experiments demonstrate the benefits of “out-of-category imitation” for copycats, and the harmful effect on the imitated brand. Copycats are evaluated more positively in a related category, because consumers appraise the similarity between copycat and imitated brand more positively than in the core category, independent of the perceived similarity itself. This is due to a reduced salience of norms regarding imitation in the related category. Moreover, the results show a damaging backlash effect of out-of-category imitation on the general evaluation of the imitated brand and on its key perceived product attributes. The findings replicate across student, MTurk, and representative consumer samples; multiple product categories; and forms of brand imitation. This research demonstrates that out-of-category brand imitation helps copycat brands and hurts national leading brands much more than has so far been considered, which has managerial and public policy implications.

KW - product imitation

KW - copycats

KW - categorization

KW - similarity

U2 - 10.1093/jcr/ucx065

DO - 10.1093/jcr/ucx065

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 816

EP - 832

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 4

ER -