Overcrowding and ‘underoccupancy’ in Romania

A case study of housing inequality

A.M. Soaita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines aspects of space consumption in two very different housing types: The communist mid-rise estates and postcommunist suburban self-built housing. Examining residents' perceptions in order to categorise space as overcrowded or underoccupied, the paper engages critically with the issue of the inefficient distribution of Romanian housing: that is, a considerable mismatch between dwelling and household size. The analysis documents the continued salience of overcrowding in the communist estates and, conversely, self-builders' satisfaction with the generous size of their new homes. Market forces permit various modes of residential mobility, but their likely outcome is growing housing inequality while any redistributive impact will remain insignificant unless policy incentives could facilitate conversion of underoccupied space into (social) renting housing. However, only a sustained delivery of larger and affordable new dwellings could alleviate overcrowding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-221
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

overcrowding
Romania
housing
residential mobility
social housing
household size
document analysis
mismatch
incentive
resident
market
dwelling

Cite this

@article{38f3060306e74251992ac5368f9e4277,
title = "Overcrowding and ‘underoccupancy’ in Romania: A case study of housing inequality",
abstract = "This paper examines aspects of space consumption in two very different housing types: The communist mid-rise estates and postcommunist suburban self-built housing. Examining residents' perceptions in order to categorise space as overcrowded or underoccupied, the paper engages critically with the issue of the inefficient distribution of Romanian housing: that is, a considerable mismatch between dwelling and household size. The analysis documents the continued salience of overcrowding in the communist estates and, conversely, self-builders' satisfaction with the generous size of their new homes. Market forces permit various modes of residential mobility, but their likely outcome is growing housing inequality while any redistributive impact will remain insignificant unless policy incentives could facilitate conversion of underoccupied space into (social) renting housing. However, only a sustained delivery of larger and affordable new dwellings could alleviate overcrowding.",
author = "A.M. Soaita",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1068/a45718",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "203--221",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Overcrowding and ‘underoccupancy’ in Romania : A case study of housing inequality. / Soaita, A.M.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2014, p. 203-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overcrowding and ‘underoccupancy’ in Romania

T2 - A case study of housing inequality

AU - Soaita, A.M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper examines aspects of space consumption in two very different housing types: The communist mid-rise estates and postcommunist suburban self-built housing. Examining residents' perceptions in order to categorise space as overcrowded or underoccupied, the paper engages critically with the issue of the inefficient distribution of Romanian housing: that is, a considerable mismatch between dwelling and household size. The analysis documents the continued salience of overcrowding in the communist estates and, conversely, self-builders' satisfaction with the generous size of their new homes. Market forces permit various modes of residential mobility, but their likely outcome is growing housing inequality while any redistributive impact will remain insignificant unless policy incentives could facilitate conversion of underoccupied space into (social) renting housing. However, only a sustained delivery of larger and affordable new dwellings could alleviate overcrowding.

AB - This paper examines aspects of space consumption in two very different housing types: The communist mid-rise estates and postcommunist suburban self-built housing. Examining residents' perceptions in order to categorise space as overcrowded or underoccupied, the paper engages critically with the issue of the inefficient distribution of Romanian housing: that is, a considerable mismatch between dwelling and household size. The analysis documents the continued salience of overcrowding in the communist estates and, conversely, self-builders' satisfaction with the generous size of their new homes. Market forces permit various modes of residential mobility, but their likely outcome is growing housing inequality while any redistributive impact will remain insignificant unless policy incentives could facilitate conversion of underoccupied space into (social) renting housing. However, only a sustained delivery of larger and affordable new dwellings could alleviate overcrowding.

U2 - 10.1068/a45718

DO - 10.1068/a45718

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 203

EP - 221

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 1

ER -