Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods

J. Gonzalez-Diaz, Ruud Hendrickx, E.R.M.A. Lohmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of several ranking methods for general tournaments. We find that the ranking method obtained by applying maximum likelihood to the (Zermelo-)Bradley-Terry model, the most common method in statistics and psychology, is one of the ranking methods that perform best with respect to the set of properties under consideration. A less known ranking method, generalised row sum, performs well too. We also study, among others, the fair bets ranking method, widely studied in social choice, and the least squares method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-169
Number of pages30
JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

ranking
Paired comparisons
Ranking
Axiomatic approach
psychology
statistics

Cite this

Gonzalez-Diaz, J. ; Hendrickx, Ruud ; Lohmann, E.R.M.A. / Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods. In: Social Choice and Welfare. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 139-169.
@article{e46b1749dad4467ebaab921b24b3c32e,
title = "Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods",
abstract = "In this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of several ranking methods for general tournaments. We find that the ranking method obtained by applying maximum likelihood to the (Zermelo-)Bradley-Terry model, the most common method in statistics and psychology, is one of the ranking methods that perform best with respect to the set of properties under consideration. A less known ranking method, generalised row sum, performs well too. We also study, among others, the fair bets ranking method, widely studied in social choice, and the least squares method.",
author = "J. Gonzalez-Diaz and Ruud Hendrickx and E.R.M.A. Lohmann",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00355-013-0726-2",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "139--169",
journal = "Social Choice and Welfare",
issn = "0176-1714",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods. / Gonzalez-Diaz, J.; Hendrickx, Ruud; Lohmann, E.R.M.A.

In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2014, p. 139-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods

AU - Gonzalez-Diaz, J.

AU - Hendrickx, Ruud

AU - Lohmann, E.R.M.A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of several ranking methods for general tournaments. We find that the ranking method obtained by applying maximum likelihood to the (Zermelo-)Bradley-Terry model, the most common method in statistics and psychology, is one of the ranking methods that perform best with respect to the set of properties under consideration. A less known ranking method, generalised row sum, performs well too. We also study, among others, the fair bets ranking method, widely studied in social choice, and the least squares method.

AB - In this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of several ranking methods for general tournaments. We find that the ranking method obtained by applying maximum likelihood to the (Zermelo-)Bradley-Terry model, the most common method in statistics and psychology, is one of the ranking methods that perform best with respect to the set of properties under consideration. A less known ranking method, generalised row sum, performs well too. We also study, among others, the fair bets ranking method, widely studied in social choice, and the least squares method.

U2 - 10.1007/s00355-013-0726-2

DO - 10.1007/s00355-013-0726-2

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 139

EP - 169

JO - Social Choice and Welfare

JF - Social Choice and Welfare

SN - 0176-1714

IS - 1

ER -