Part of the message comes in gesture: how people with aphasia convey information in different gesture types as compared with information in their speech

Karin van Nispen*, Mieke van de Sandt-Koenderman, Kazuki Sekine, Emiel Krahmer, Miranda L. Rose

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that the gestures produced by people with aphasia (PWA) can convey information useful for their communication. However, the exact significance of the contribution to message communication via gesture remains unclear. Furthermore, it remains unclear how different gesture types and representation techniques impact message conveyance.Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the contribution of gesture to PWA's communication. We specifically focussed on the degree to which different gesture types and representation techniques convey information absent in the speech of PWA.Methods & Procedure: We studied the gestures produced by 46 PWA and nine non-brain-damaged participants (NBDP) during semi-structured conversation. For each of the different types of gestures and representation techniques we identified whether these conveyed essential information, that is information that was absent in speech. Rather than looking at information that was either similar to information in speech or additional to information in speech, we focused on the essential gestures only.Outcomes & Results: For PWA, a fifth of their gestures were Essential. Despite individual differences between PWA, the majority produced more Essential gestures than NBDP, who produced limited amounts of Essential gestures. Essential information was mostly conveyed by specific gesture types: Pointing, Emblems and Iconic gesture. Within the group of iconic gestures, not only Handling and Enact but also Object and Shape gestures, were often Essential.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a great proportion of gestures produced by most PWA convey information essential for understanding their communication. In their communication advice, speech language therapists could draw attention to specific gesture types to make sure that interlocutors pay more attention to these gestures when communicating with PWA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1078-1103
Number of pages26
JournalAphasiology
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Gesture
  • non-verbal communication
  • communication
  • aphasia
  • representation techniques
  • iconicity
  • VERBAL COMMUNICATION
  • ICONIC GESTURES
  • NAMING THERAPY
  • LANGUAGE
  • PANTOMIME
  • DISCOURSE
  • SPEAKERS
  • GESTICULATION
  • APRAXIA
  • SYSTEM

Cite this

van Nispen, Karin ; van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke ; Sekine, Kazuki ; Krahmer, Emiel ; Rose, Miranda L. / Part of the message comes in gesture : how people with aphasia convey information in different gesture types as compared with information in their speech. In: Aphasiology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 9. pp. 1078-1103.
@article{d1bef89b77194dce929b7e337e4a79c4,
title = "Part of the message comes in gesture: how people with aphasia convey information in different gesture types as compared with information in their speech",
abstract = "Background: Studies have shown that the gestures produced by people with aphasia (PWA) can convey information useful for their communication. However, the exact significance of the contribution to message communication via gesture remains unclear. Furthermore, it remains unclear how different gesture types and representation techniques impact message conveyance.Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the contribution of gesture to PWA's communication. We specifically focussed on the degree to which different gesture types and representation techniques convey information absent in the speech of PWA.Methods & Procedure: We studied the gestures produced by 46 PWA and nine non-brain-damaged participants (NBDP) during semi-structured conversation. For each of the different types of gestures and representation techniques we identified whether these conveyed essential information, that is information that was absent in speech. Rather than looking at information that was either similar to information in speech or additional to information in speech, we focused on the essential gestures only.Outcomes & Results: For PWA, a fifth of their gestures were Essential. Despite individual differences between PWA, the majority produced more Essential gestures than NBDP, who produced limited amounts of Essential gestures. Essential information was mostly conveyed by specific gesture types: Pointing, Emblems and Iconic gesture. Within the group of iconic gestures, not only Handling and Enact but also Object and Shape gestures, were often Essential.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a great proportion of gestures produced by most PWA convey information essential for understanding their communication. In their communication advice, speech language therapists could draw attention to specific gesture types to make sure that interlocutors pay more attention to these gestures when communicating with PWA.",
keywords = "Gesture, non-verbal communication, communication, aphasia, representation techniques, iconicity, VERBAL COMMUNICATION, ICONIC GESTURES, NAMING THERAPY, LANGUAGE, PANTOMIME, DISCOURSE, SPEAKERS, GESTICULATION, APRAXIA, SYSTEM",
author = "{van Nispen}, Karin and {van de Sandt-Koenderman}, Mieke and Kazuki Sekine and Emiel Krahmer and Rose, {Miranda L.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/02687038.2017.1301368",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1078--1103",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "9",

}

Part of the message comes in gesture : how people with aphasia convey information in different gesture types as compared with information in their speech. / van Nispen, Karin; van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke; Sekine, Kazuki; Krahmer, Emiel; Rose, Miranda L.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2017, p. 1078-1103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Part of the message comes in gesture

T2 - how people with aphasia convey information in different gesture types as compared with information in their speech

AU - van Nispen, Karin

AU - van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke

AU - Sekine, Kazuki

AU - Krahmer, Emiel

AU - Rose, Miranda L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Studies have shown that the gestures produced by people with aphasia (PWA) can convey information useful for their communication. However, the exact significance of the contribution to message communication via gesture remains unclear. Furthermore, it remains unclear how different gesture types and representation techniques impact message conveyance.Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the contribution of gesture to PWA's communication. We specifically focussed on the degree to which different gesture types and representation techniques convey information absent in the speech of PWA.Methods & Procedure: We studied the gestures produced by 46 PWA and nine non-brain-damaged participants (NBDP) during semi-structured conversation. For each of the different types of gestures and representation techniques we identified whether these conveyed essential information, that is information that was absent in speech. Rather than looking at information that was either similar to information in speech or additional to information in speech, we focused on the essential gestures only.Outcomes & Results: For PWA, a fifth of their gestures were Essential. Despite individual differences between PWA, the majority produced more Essential gestures than NBDP, who produced limited amounts of Essential gestures. Essential information was mostly conveyed by specific gesture types: Pointing, Emblems and Iconic gesture. Within the group of iconic gestures, not only Handling and Enact but also Object and Shape gestures, were often Essential.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a great proportion of gestures produced by most PWA convey information essential for understanding their communication. In their communication advice, speech language therapists could draw attention to specific gesture types to make sure that interlocutors pay more attention to these gestures when communicating with PWA.

AB - Background: Studies have shown that the gestures produced by people with aphasia (PWA) can convey information useful for their communication. However, the exact significance of the contribution to message communication via gesture remains unclear. Furthermore, it remains unclear how different gesture types and representation techniques impact message conveyance.Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the contribution of gesture to PWA's communication. We specifically focussed on the degree to which different gesture types and representation techniques convey information absent in the speech of PWA.Methods & Procedure: We studied the gestures produced by 46 PWA and nine non-brain-damaged participants (NBDP) during semi-structured conversation. For each of the different types of gestures and representation techniques we identified whether these conveyed essential information, that is information that was absent in speech. Rather than looking at information that was either similar to information in speech or additional to information in speech, we focused on the essential gestures only.Outcomes & Results: For PWA, a fifth of their gestures were Essential. Despite individual differences between PWA, the majority produced more Essential gestures than NBDP, who produced limited amounts of Essential gestures. Essential information was mostly conveyed by specific gesture types: Pointing, Emblems and Iconic gesture. Within the group of iconic gestures, not only Handling and Enact but also Object and Shape gestures, were often Essential.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a great proportion of gestures produced by most PWA convey information essential for understanding their communication. In their communication advice, speech language therapists could draw attention to specific gesture types to make sure that interlocutors pay more attention to these gestures when communicating with PWA.

KW - Gesture

KW - non-verbal communication

KW - communication

KW - aphasia

KW - representation techniques

KW - iconicity

KW - VERBAL COMMUNICATION

KW - ICONIC GESTURES

KW - NAMING THERAPY

KW - LANGUAGE

KW - PANTOMIME

KW - DISCOURSE

KW - SPEAKERS

KW - GESTICULATION

KW - APRAXIA

KW - SYSTEM

U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2017.1301368

DO - 10.1080/02687038.2017.1301368

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1078

EP - 1103

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 9

ER -