Patients whose GP knows complementary medicine tend to have lower costs and live longer

P. Kooreman, E. Baars

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Health economists have largely ignored complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as an area of research, although both clinical experiences and several empirical studies suggest cost-effectiveness of CAM.

Objective
To explore the cost-effectiveness of CAM compared with conventional medicine.

Methods
A dataset from a Dutch health insurer was used containing quarterly information on healthcare costs (care by general practitioner (GP), hospital care, pharmaceutical care, and paramedic care), dates of birth and death, gender and 6-digit postcode of all approximately 150,000 insurees, for the years 2006–2009. Data from 1913 conventional GPs were compared with data from 79 GPs with additional CAM training in acupuncture (25), homeopathy (28), and anthroposophic medicine (26).

Results
Patients whose GP has additional CAM training have 0–30% lower healthcare costs and mortality rates, depending on age groups and type of CAM. The lower costs result from fewer hospital stays and fewer prescription drugs.

Discussion
Since the differences are obtained while controlling for confounders including neighborhood specific fixed effects at a highly detailed level, the lower costs and longer lives are unlikely to be related to differences in socioeconomic status. Possible explanations include selection (e.g. people with a low taste for medical interventions might be more likely to choose CAM) and better practices (e.g. less overtreatment, more focus on preventive and curative health promotion) by GPs with knowledge of complementary medicine. More controlled studies (replication studies, research based on more comprehensive data, cost-effectiveness studies on CAM for specific diagnostic categories) are indicated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-776
JournalEuropean Journal of Health Economics
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Complementary and alternative medicine
Complementary medicine
Costs
General practitioners
Medicine
Homeopathy
Allied Health Personnel
Insurance Carriers
Pharmaceutical Services
Acupuncture
General Hospitals
Cost-effectiveness
Length of Stay

Cite this

@article{e7e69d6500d546c3a780cb1e159a0108,
title = "Patients whose GP knows complementary medicine tend to have lower costs and live longer",
abstract = "BackgroundHealth economists have largely ignored complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as an area of research, although both clinical experiences and several empirical studies suggest cost-effectiveness of CAM.ObjectiveTo explore the cost-effectiveness of CAM compared with conventional medicine.MethodsA dataset from a Dutch health insurer was used containing quarterly information on healthcare costs (care by general practitioner (GP), hospital care, pharmaceutical care, and paramedic care), dates of birth and death, gender and 6-digit postcode of all approximately 150,000 insurees, for the years 2006–2009. Data from 1913 conventional GPs were compared with data from 79 GPs with additional CAM training in acupuncture (25), homeopathy (28), and anthroposophic medicine (26).ResultsPatients whose GP has additional CAM training have 0–30{\%} lower healthcare costs and mortality rates, depending on age groups and type of CAM. The lower costs result from fewer hospital stays and fewer prescription drugs.DiscussionSince the differences are obtained while controlling for confounders including neighborhood specific fixed effects at a highly detailed level, the lower costs and longer lives are unlikely to be related to differences in socioeconomic status. Possible explanations include selection (e.g. people with a low taste for medical interventions might be more likely to choose CAM) and better practices (e.g. less overtreatment, more focus on preventive and curative health promotion) by GPs with knowledge of complementary medicine. More controlled studies (replication studies, research based on more comprehensive data, cost-effectiveness studies on CAM for specific diagnostic categories) are indicated.",
author = "P. Kooreman and E. Baars",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007{\%}2fs10198-011-0330-2",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "769--776",
journal = "The European Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "1618-7598",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

Patients whose GP knows complementary medicine tend to have lower costs and live longer. / Kooreman, P.; Baars, E.

In: European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2012, p. 769-776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients whose GP knows complementary medicine tend to have lower costs and live longer

AU - Kooreman, P.

AU - Baars, E.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - BackgroundHealth economists have largely ignored complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as an area of research, although both clinical experiences and several empirical studies suggest cost-effectiveness of CAM.ObjectiveTo explore the cost-effectiveness of CAM compared with conventional medicine.MethodsA dataset from a Dutch health insurer was used containing quarterly information on healthcare costs (care by general practitioner (GP), hospital care, pharmaceutical care, and paramedic care), dates of birth and death, gender and 6-digit postcode of all approximately 150,000 insurees, for the years 2006–2009. Data from 1913 conventional GPs were compared with data from 79 GPs with additional CAM training in acupuncture (25), homeopathy (28), and anthroposophic medicine (26).ResultsPatients whose GP has additional CAM training have 0–30% lower healthcare costs and mortality rates, depending on age groups and type of CAM. The lower costs result from fewer hospital stays and fewer prescription drugs.DiscussionSince the differences are obtained while controlling for confounders including neighborhood specific fixed effects at a highly detailed level, the lower costs and longer lives are unlikely to be related to differences in socioeconomic status. Possible explanations include selection (e.g. people with a low taste for medical interventions might be more likely to choose CAM) and better practices (e.g. less overtreatment, more focus on preventive and curative health promotion) by GPs with knowledge of complementary medicine. More controlled studies (replication studies, research based on more comprehensive data, cost-effectiveness studies on CAM for specific diagnostic categories) are indicated.

AB - BackgroundHealth economists have largely ignored complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as an area of research, although both clinical experiences and several empirical studies suggest cost-effectiveness of CAM.ObjectiveTo explore the cost-effectiveness of CAM compared with conventional medicine.MethodsA dataset from a Dutch health insurer was used containing quarterly information on healthcare costs (care by general practitioner (GP), hospital care, pharmaceutical care, and paramedic care), dates of birth and death, gender and 6-digit postcode of all approximately 150,000 insurees, for the years 2006–2009. Data from 1913 conventional GPs were compared with data from 79 GPs with additional CAM training in acupuncture (25), homeopathy (28), and anthroposophic medicine (26).ResultsPatients whose GP has additional CAM training have 0–30% lower healthcare costs and mortality rates, depending on age groups and type of CAM. The lower costs result from fewer hospital stays and fewer prescription drugs.DiscussionSince the differences are obtained while controlling for confounders including neighborhood specific fixed effects at a highly detailed level, the lower costs and longer lives are unlikely to be related to differences in socioeconomic status. Possible explanations include selection (e.g. people with a low taste for medical interventions might be more likely to choose CAM) and better practices (e.g. less overtreatment, more focus on preventive and curative health promotion) by GPs with knowledge of complementary medicine. More controlled studies (replication studies, research based on more comprehensive data, cost-effectiveness studies on CAM for specific diagnostic categories) are indicated.

U2 - 10.1007%2fs10198-011-0330-2

DO - 10.1007%2fs10198-011-0330-2

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 769

EP - 776

JO - The European Journal of Health Economics

JF - The European Journal of Health Economics

SN - 1618-7598

IS - 6

ER -