Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services

M. Ungar, L. Liebenberg, M. Armstrong, P. Dudding, F.J.R. van de Vijver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Very little research has examined the relationship between resilience, risk, and the service use patterns of adolescents with complex needs who use multiple formal and mandated services such as child welfare, mental health, juvenile justice, and special educational supports. This article reports on a study of 497 adolescents in Atlantic Canada who were known to have used at least 2 of these services in the last 6 months. It was hypothesized that greater service use and satisfaction with services would predict both resilience, and better functional outcomes such as prosocial behavior, school engagement and participation in community.
Methods
Youth who were known to be multiple service users and who were between the ages of 13 and 21 participated in the study. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire administered individually. Path analysis was used to determine the relationship between risk, service use, resilience, and functional outcomes. MANOVA was then used to determine patterns of service use and service use satisfaction among participants.
Results
Findings show that there was no significant relationship between service use history and resilience or any of the three functional outcomes. Service use satisfaction, a measure of an adolescent's perception of the quality of the services received, did however show a strong positive relationship with resilience. Resilience mediates the impact of risk factors on outcomes and is affected positively by the quality, but not the quantity, of the psychosocial services provided to adolescents with complex needs.
Conclusions
Results show that resilience is related to service satisfaction but not the quantity of services used by youth. Coordinated services may not increase resilience or be more effective unless the quality of individual services is experienced by an adolescent receiving intervention as personally empowering and sensitive to his or her needs.
Keywords: Resilience, Child welfare, Mental health, Juvenile corrections, Educational supports, Service use, Service satisfaction, Adolescents, Contextual risk
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-159
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Self Report
History
Surveys and Questionnaires
Community Participation

Cite this

Ungar, M. ; Liebenberg, L. ; Armstrong, M. ; Dudding, P. ; van de Vijver, F.J.R. / Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. In: Child Abuse and Neglect. 2013 ; Vol. 37. pp. 150-159.
@article{2115546c2c6748e1867df0544b97db76,
title = "Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services",
abstract = "BackgroundVery little research has examined the relationship between resilience, risk, and the service use patterns of adolescents with complex needs who use multiple formal and mandated services such as child welfare, mental health, juvenile justice, and special educational supports. This article reports on a study of 497 adolescents in Atlantic Canada who were known to have used at least 2 of these services in the last 6 months. It was hypothesized that greater service use and satisfaction with services would predict both resilience, and better functional outcomes such as prosocial behavior, school engagement and participation in community.MethodsYouth who were known to be multiple service users and who were between the ages of 13 and 21 participated in the study. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire administered individually. Path analysis was used to determine the relationship between risk, service use, resilience, and functional outcomes. MANOVA was then used to determine patterns of service use and service use satisfaction among participants.ResultsFindings show that there was no significant relationship between service use history and resilience or any of the three functional outcomes. Service use satisfaction, a measure of an adolescent's perception of the quality of the services received, did however show a strong positive relationship with resilience. Resilience mediates the impact of risk factors on outcomes and is affected positively by the quality, but not the quantity, of the psychosocial services provided to adolescents with complex needs.ConclusionsResults show that resilience is related to service satisfaction but not the quantity of services used by youth. Coordinated services may not increase resilience or be more effective unless the quality of individual services is experienced by an adolescent receiving intervention as personally empowering and sensitive to his or her needs.Keywords: Resilience, Child welfare, Mental health, Juvenile corrections, Educational supports, Service use, Service satisfaction, Adolescents, Contextual risk",
author = "M. Ungar and L. Liebenberg and M. Armstrong and P. Dudding and {van de Vijver}, F.J.R.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.05.007",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "150--159",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. / Ungar, M.; Liebenberg, L.; Armstrong, M.; Dudding, P.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 37, 2013, p. 150-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services

AU - Ungar, M.

AU - Liebenberg, L.

AU - Armstrong, M.

AU - Dudding, P.

AU - van de Vijver, F.J.R.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - BackgroundVery little research has examined the relationship between resilience, risk, and the service use patterns of adolescents with complex needs who use multiple formal and mandated services such as child welfare, mental health, juvenile justice, and special educational supports. This article reports on a study of 497 adolescents in Atlantic Canada who were known to have used at least 2 of these services in the last 6 months. It was hypothesized that greater service use and satisfaction with services would predict both resilience, and better functional outcomes such as prosocial behavior, school engagement and participation in community.MethodsYouth who were known to be multiple service users and who were between the ages of 13 and 21 participated in the study. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire administered individually. Path analysis was used to determine the relationship between risk, service use, resilience, and functional outcomes. MANOVA was then used to determine patterns of service use and service use satisfaction among participants.ResultsFindings show that there was no significant relationship between service use history and resilience or any of the three functional outcomes. Service use satisfaction, a measure of an adolescent's perception of the quality of the services received, did however show a strong positive relationship with resilience. Resilience mediates the impact of risk factors on outcomes and is affected positively by the quality, but not the quantity, of the psychosocial services provided to adolescents with complex needs.ConclusionsResults show that resilience is related to service satisfaction but not the quantity of services used by youth. Coordinated services may not increase resilience or be more effective unless the quality of individual services is experienced by an adolescent receiving intervention as personally empowering and sensitive to his or her needs.Keywords: Resilience, Child welfare, Mental health, Juvenile corrections, Educational supports, Service use, Service satisfaction, Adolescents, Contextual risk

AB - BackgroundVery little research has examined the relationship between resilience, risk, and the service use patterns of adolescents with complex needs who use multiple formal and mandated services such as child welfare, mental health, juvenile justice, and special educational supports. This article reports on a study of 497 adolescents in Atlantic Canada who were known to have used at least 2 of these services in the last 6 months. It was hypothesized that greater service use and satisfaction with services would predict both resilience, and better functional outcomes such as prosocial behavior, school engagement and participation in community.MethodsYouth who were known to be multiple service users and who were between the ages of 13 and 21 participated in the study. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire administered individually. Path analysis was used to determine the relationship between risk, service use, resilience, and functional outcomes. MANOVA was then used to determine patterns of service use and service use satisfaction among participants.ResultsFindings show that there was no significant relationship between service use history and resilience or any of the three functional outcomes. Service use satisfaction, a measure of an adolescent's perception of the quality of the services received, did however show a strong positive relationship with resilience. Resilience mediates the impact of risk factors on outcomes and is affected positively by the quality, but not the quantity, of the psychosocial services provided to adolescents with complex needs.ConclusionsResults show that resilience is related to service satisfaction but not the quantity of services used by youth. Coordinated services may not increase resilience or be more effective unless the quality of individual services is experienced by an adolescent receiving intervention as personally empowering and sensitive to his or her needs.Keywords: Resilience, Child welfare, Mental health, Juvenile corrections, Educational supports, Service use, Service satisfaction, Adolescents, Contextual risk

U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 150

EP - 159

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

ER -