Peer status beyond adolescence

Types and behavioral associations

Britta Ruschoff, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, René Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the types and behavioral associations of peer status in school-bound young adults in the Netherlands. We argue that adolescent peer popularity and its link with aggressive and norm-breaking behavior result from adolescents' desire to create an image of maturity among their peers. We expect that in young adults who are approaching working life, peer status is defined by affective measures of status and prosociality rather than adverse behaviors. Analyses revealed a three cluster solution of (1) liked, (2) liked-popular and (3) neutral members of the peer group, showing that status is primarily defined by being well-liked, though popularity remains relevant. Status was primarily associated with prosocial behavior, especially for females. Peer status in young males remained associated with overt aggressive behavior.

Keywords: Peer status, Young adulthood, Maturity gap, Prosocial behavior, Aggression, Norm-breaking behavior

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalJournal of Adolescence
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Adolescent Behavior
Netherlands

Cite this

Ruschoff, Britta ; Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis ; Veenstra, René ; Lindenberg, Siegwart. / Peer status beyond adolescence : Types and behavioral associations. In: Journal of Adolescence. 2015 ; Vol. 45. pp. 1-10.
@article{56ac37e6eefc47b986525ff3304c84f0,
title = "Peer status beyond adolescence: Types and behavioral associations",
abstract = "This study investigates the types and behavioral associations of peer status in school-bound young adults in the Netherlands. We argue that adolescent peer popularity and its link with aggressive and norm-breaking behavior result from adolescents' desire to create an image of maturity among their peers. We expect that in young adults who are approaching working life, peer status is defined by affective measures of status and prosociality rather than adverse behaviors. Analyses revealed a three cluster solution of (1) liked, (2) liked-popular and (3) neutral members of the peer group, showing that status is primarily defined by being well-liked, though popularity remains relevant. Status was primarily associated with prosocial behavior, especially for females. Peer status in young males remained associated with overt aggressive behavior. Keywords: Peer status, Young adulthood, Maturity gap, Prosocial behavior, Aggression, Norm-breaking behavior",
author = "Britta Ruschoff and Dijkstra, {Jan Kornelis} and Ren{\'e} Veenstra and Siegwart Lindenberg",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2015 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Adolescence",
issn = "0140-1971",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

Peer status beyond adolescence : Types and behavioral associations. / Ruschoff, Britta; Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis; Veenstra, René; Lindenberg, Siegwart.

In: Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 45, 2015, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer status beyond adolescence

T2 - Types and behavioral associations

AU - Ruschoff, Britta

AU - Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis

AU - Veenstra, René

AU - Lindenberg, Siegwart

N1 - Copyright © 2015 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study investigates the types and behavioral associations of peer status in school-bound young adults in the Netherlands. We argue that adolescent peer popularity and its link with aggressive and norm-breaking behavior result from adolescents' desire to create an image of maturity among their peers. We expect that in young adults who are approaching working life, peer status is defined by affective measures of status and prosociality rather than adverse behaviors. Analyses revealed a three cluster solution of (1) liked, (2) liked-popular and (3) neutral members of the peer group, showing that status is primarily defined by being well-liked, though popularity remains relevant. Status was primarily associated with prosocial behavior, especially for females. Peer status in young males remained associated with overt aggressive behavior. Keywords: Peer status, Young adulthood, Maturity gap, Prosocial behavior, Aggression, Norm-breaking behavior

AB - This study investigates the types and behavioral associations of peer status in school-bound young adults in the Netherlands. We argue that adolescent peer popularity and its link with aggressive and norm-breaking behavior result from adolescents' desire to create an image of maturity among their peers. We expect that in young adults who are approaching working life, peer status is defined by affective measures of status and prosociality rather than adverse behaviors. Analyses revealed a three cluster solution of (1) liked, (2) liked-popular and (3) neutral members of the peer group, showing that status is primarily defined by being well-liked, though popularity remains relevant. Status was primarily associated with prosocial behavior, especially for females. Peer status in young males remained associated with overt aggressive behavior. Keywords: Peer status, Young adulthood, Maturity gap, Prosocial behavior, Aggression, Norm-breaking behavior

U2 - 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.013

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Adolescence

JF - Journal of Adolescence

SN - 0140-1971

ER -