Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries

Steven Debets, Henriette Prast, Mariacristina Rossi, Arthur van Soest

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In many countries, pension reforms reduce the generosity of collective pensions and shift the responsibility for an adequate standard of living after retirement to individuals and their households. Individuals have to make more decisions than before on supplementary pension savings, on how to invest their DC pension assets, etc. Making such decisions is challenging, since retirement planning requires intertemporal decision-making under uncertainty and is subject to
behavioural and psychological biases. Many studies in different countries have shown that the large majority lack the interest, knowledge, or skills to make such decisions in a way that is in their own best interest. Governments and the pension industry try to assist individuals in making the right decisions through pension communication. This paper focuses on experiences with pension
communication, and the lessons to be learned from them. First, the paper provides an overview of the literature, addressing how pension communication is organized across countries and what can be said about its efficiency. Second, using Dutch longitudinal data at the individual level, we analyse the relations between communication (receiving an annual pension overview), pension knowledge, and conscious pension decision-making. We investigate associations and aim at estimating causal effects exploiting the timing of events.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages36
Volume2018-047
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2018

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2018-047

Fingerprint

Communication
Pensions
The Netherlands
Decision making
Industry
Standard of living
Longitudinal data
Pension reform
Psychological
Causal effect
Decision rights
Retirement
Household
Assets
Retirement planning
Government
Generosity
Responsibility
Savings
Decision making under uncertainty

Keywords

  • pension saving
  • involvement
  • pension knowledge
  • ageing
  • retirement

Cite this

Debets, S., Prast, H., Rossi, M., & van Soest, A. (2018). Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-047). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Debets, Steven ; Prast, Henriette ; Rossi, Mariacristina ; van Soest, Arthur. / Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries. Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{247a0420215040f58b298e36d286f638,
title = "Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries",
abstract = "In many countries, pension reforms reduce the generosity of collective pensions and shift the responsibility for an adequate standard of living after retirement to individuals and their households. Individuals have to make more decisions than before on supplementary pension savings, on how to invest their DC pension assets, etc. Making such decisions is challenging, since retirement planning requires intertemporal decision-making under uncertainty and is subject tobehavioural and psychological biases. Many studies in different countries have shown that the large majority lack the interest, knowledge, or skills to make such decisions in a way that is in their own best interest. Governments and the pension industry try to assist individuals in making the right decisions through pension communication. This paper focuses on experiences with pensioncommunication, and the lessons to be learned from them. First, the paper provides an overview of the literature, addressing how pension communication is organized across countries and what can be said about its efficiency. Second, using Dutch longitudinal data at the individual level, we analyse the relations between communication (receiving an annual pension overview), pension knowledge, and conscious pension decision-making. We investigate associations and aim at estimating causal effects exploiting the timing of events.",
keywords = "pension saving, involvement, pension knowledge, ageing, retirement",
author = "Steven Debets and Henriette Prast and Mariacristina Rossi and {van Soest}, Arthur",
note = "CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2018-047",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "14",
language = "English",
volume = "2018-047",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Debets, S, Prast, H, Rossi, M & van Soest, A 2018 'Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2018-047, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries. / Debets, Steven; Prast, Henriette; Rossi, Mariacristina; van Soest, Arthur.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-047).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries

AU - Debets, Steven

AU - Prast, Henriette

AU - Rossi, Mariacristina

AU - van Soest, Arthur

N1 - CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2018-047

PY - 2018/11/14

Y1 - 2018/11/14

N2 - In many countries, pension reforms reduce the generosity of collective pensions and shift the responsibility for an adequate standard of living after retirement to individuals and their households. Individuals have to make more decisions than before on supplementary pension savings, on how to invest their DC pension assets, etc. Making such decisions is challenging, since retirement planning requires intertemporal decision-making under uncertainty and is subject tobehavioural and psychological biases. Many studies in different countries have shown that the large majority lack the interest, knowledge, or skills to make such decisions in a way that is in their own best interest. Governments and the pension industry try to assist individuals in making the right decisions through pension communication. This paper focuses on experiences with pensioncommunication, and the lessons to be learned from them. First, the paper provides an overview of the literature, addressing how pension communication is organized across countries and what can be said about its efficiency. Second, using Dutch longitudinal data at the individual level, we analyse the relations between communication (receiving an annual pension overview), pension knowledge, and conscious pension decision-making. We investigate associations and aim at estimating causal effects exploiting the timing of events.

AB - In many countries, pension reforms reduce the generosity of collective pensions and shift the responsibility for an adequate standard of living after retirement to individuals and their households. Individuals have to make more decisions than before on supplementary pension savings, on how to invest their DC pension assets, etc. Making such decisions is challenging, since retirement planning requires intertemporal decision-making under uncertainty and is subject tobehavioural and psychological biases. Many studies in different countries have shown that the large majority lack the interest, knowledge, or skills to make such decisions in a way that is in their own best interest. Governments and the pension industry try to assist individuals in making the right decisions through pension communication. This paper focuses on experiences with pensioncommunication, and the lessons to be learned from them. First, the paper provides an overview of the literature, addressing how pension communication is organized across countries and what can be said about its efficiency. Second, using Dutch longitudinal data at the individual level, we analyse the relations between communication (receiving an annual pension overview), pension knowledge, and conscious pension decision-making. We investigate associations and aim at estimating causal effects exploiting the timing of events.

KW - pension saving

KW - involvement

KW - pension knowledge

KW - ageing

KW - retirement

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2018-047

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Debets S, Prast H, Rossi M, van Soest A. Pension Communication in the Netherlands and Other Countries. Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2018 Nov 14. (CentER Discussion Paper).