Perceived analogical communication in design teams: Development and validation of a scale

D. Graff*, N. Meslec, M. Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Analogies have been shown to play a key role in design collaboration. However, research has been largely limited to the analogy itself and how it is used, overlooking the impact of analogy from the recipients' perspective. This is a critical aspect, considering the imperfect information transfer between members in design teams. We address this gap by developing a measure of perceived analogical communication in teams, focusing on the interpretation of the use of analogy in internal design team communications. We test the resulting scale across 3 samples, totalling 252 multi-disciplinary teams with 1182 team members. Results show that the scale is an internally consistent, distinct construct, and holds predictive validity for relevant design team processes and outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-76
JournalDesign Studies
Volume67
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived analogical communication in design teams: Development and validation of a scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this