Research output per year
Research output per year
Abstract
In the debates about court management and court administration, the recurring question is how the interaction between organizational functioning and judges may evolve, both from a judicial impartiality and independence value perspective and a (democratic) accountability perspective. Effectiveness and efficiency are implied here. Also in those respects, performance measurement and management for courts and judges is complicated by the paradox described above. Therefore, a principled question is: is it possible to conduct performance management in a judiciary without putting too much pressure on judges so that content and outcomes of judicial decision making are being influenced? And if so, how?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Handle with care |
| Subtitle of host publication | Deliverable 3.1: Report- Performance management of courts and judges: Organisational and professional learning vs political accountability |
| Pages | 297-325 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9788897439080 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance management of courts and judges: Organizational and professional learning versus political accountabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Chapter
-
The evaluation and development of the quality of justice in The Netherlands
Dijkstra, R., Langbroek, P., Bozorg Zadeh, K. & Turk, Z., 2017, Handle with care: Deliverable1.6: Report- The evaluation and development of quality of justice in the Netherlands. p. 227-276 50 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific
Open Access