Physicalism or Anti-physicalism: A Disjunctive Account

Umut Baysan*, Nathan Wildman

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, we make a case for the disjunctive view of phenomenal consciousness: consciousness is essentially disjunctive in being either physical or non-physical in the sense that it has both physical and non-physical possible instances. We motivate this view by showing that it undermines two well-known conceivability arguments in philosophy of mind: the zombie argument for anti-physicalism, and the anti-zombie argument for physicalism. By appealing to the disjunctive view, we argue that two hitherto unquestioned premises of these arguments are false. Furthermore, making use of the resources of this view, we formulate distinct forms of both physicalism and anti-physicalism. On these formulations, it is easy to see how physicalists and anti-physicalists can accommodate the modal intuitions of their opponents regarding zombies and anti-zombies. We conclude that these formulations of physicalism and anti-physicalism are superior to their more traditional counterparts.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-239
    Number of pages17
    JournalErkenntnis
    Early online date20 May 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Keywords

    • Conditional Analysis
    • Phenomenal Consciousness
    • Disjunctive vVew

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Physicalism or Anti-physicalism: A Disjunctive Account'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this