Physiological and emotional responses to evaluative stress in socially inhibited young adults

Stefanie Duijndam, Annemiek Karreman, Denollet †, Nina Kupper*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
There are large individual differences in dealing with everyday social stress. Therefore, we investigated the association of social inhibition (and its facets) with the emotional and physiological responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST).

Methods
Undergraduate students (N = 312) completed the 15-item Social Inhibition Questionnaire (SIQ15) and participated in the TSST, while emotional and cardiovascular stress responses were recorded. We examined the effect of social inhibition across time with repeated-measures ANCOVAs.

Findings
During social stress (and recovery), social inhibition was associated with increased negative mood reactivity (especially the behavioral inhibition facet) and heightened sympathetic activation (especially the social withdrawal and interpersonal sensitivity). Physiological stress reactivity seems to be mostly α-adrenergic in women, and also β-adrenergic in men.

Conclusions
Emotional and physiological stress responses are associated with individual differences in social inhibition. This warrants more research on mechanisms that underlie the relations between social inhibition, stress and health.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107811
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume149
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
  • ASSOCIATION
  • BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION
  • BLOOD-PRESSURE
  • D PERSONALITY
  • Emotional reactivity
  • GENDER-DIFFERENCES
  • HEART-RATE
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • Physiological reactivity
  • RISK
  • SYMPATHETIC-NERVOUS-SYSTEM
  • Social inhibition
  • Social stress
  • Stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physiological and emotional responses to evaluative stress in socially inhibited young adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this