Abstract
Keywords: ostracism, exclusion, thermography, pupillometry
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Current directions in ostracism, social exclusion and rejection research |
| Editors | S.C. Rudert, R. Greifeneder, K.D. Williams |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2019 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Physiostracism : A case for non-invasive measures of arousal in ostracism research. / van Beest, I.; Sleegers, W.
Current directions in ostracism, social exclusion and rejection research. ed. / S.C. Rudert; R. Greifeneder; K.D. Williams. Routledge, 2019.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review
TY - CHAP
T1 - Physiostracism
T2 - A case for non-invasive measures of arousal in ostracism research
AU - van Beest, I.
AU - Sleegers, W.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Ostracism research relies increasingly on physiological measures. In the current chapter, we provide a short overview showing that the ostracism experience is more physiologically stressful than the inclusion experience. We also argue that physiological measurement differ in invasiveness. Most physiological measurements rely on direct contact and/or restrict the movement of the participant. We argue that this may lead participants to attribute arousal to the measurement and therefore make (a) the assessment of physiological measures less reliable, and (b) difficult to assess the relation between arousal and coping. Crucially, new measurement techniques such as eye-tracking and thermography are relatively less invasive for participants. We provide two studies as an example and a call to use these measurements more often.Keywords: ostracism, exclusion, thermography, pupillometry
AB - Ostracism research relies increasingly on physiological measures. In the current chapter, we provide a short overview showing that the ostracism experience is more physiologically stressful than the inclusion experience. We also argue that physiological measurement differ in invasiveness. Most physiological measurements rely on direct contact and/or restrict the movement of the participant. We argue that this may lead participants to attribute arousal to the measurement and therefore make (a) the assessment of physiological measures less reliable, and (b) difficult to assess the relation between arousal and coping. Crucially, new measurement techniques such as eye-tracking and thermography are relatively less invasive for participants. We provide two studies as an example and a call to use these measurements more often.Keywords: ostracism, exclusion, thermography, pupillometry
M3 - Chapter
BT - Current directions in ostracism, social exclusion and rejection research
A2 - Rudert, S.C.
A2 - Greifeneder, R.
A2 - Williams, K.D.
PB - Routledge
ER -