Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest

Paul Mutsaers, Tom van Nuenen

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

99 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Diarmaid Harkin recently called for a theory of police punishment and its public acceptance. He stated that police violence is ‘provided with a warranty of approval and encouragement from larger, aggregate, deeply held emotions and sensibilities’. We lend our support to his demand for a penal theory of police, but disagree in regard to his explanation of the relative quiescence of “the public” in the face of police punishment. We do so on empirical, epistemological and methodological grounds by (1) centralizing anti-police protest and resistance instead of consensus and acceptance of police punishment; (2) raising the epistemological question “how do we know protest/approval?” and (3) addressing the methodological aspects of studying online resistance, or “hashtag activism”, in anti-police protest. Central to our thesis is James Scott’s theory of hidden transcripts and the infrapolitics of resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameTilburg Papers in Culture Studies
No.164

Fingerprint

protest
penalty
police
acceptance
emotion
violence
demand

Keywords

  • police punishment
  • (online) resistance
  • hashtag activism
  • infrapolitics
  • hidden transcripts

Cite this

Mutsaers, P., & van Nuenen, T. (2016). Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest. (pp. 1-20). (Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies; No. 164).
Mutsaers, Paul ; van Nuenen, Tom. / Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest. 2016. pp. 1-20 (Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies; 164).
@techreport{68e5f12307b74863a499c5d431af7232,
title = "Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest",
abstract = "Diarmaid Harkin recently called for a theory of police punishment and its public acceptance. He stated that police violence is ‘provided with a warranty of approval and encouragement from larger, aggregate, deeply held emotions and sensibilities’. We lend our support to his demand for a penal theory of police, but disagree in regard to his explanation of the relative quiescence of “the public” in the face of police punishment. We do so on empirical, epistemological and methodological grounds by (1) centralizing anti-police protest and resistance instead of consensus and acceptance of police punishment; (2) raising the epistemological question “how do we know protest/approval?” and (3) addressing the methodological aspects of studying online resistance, or “hashtag activism”, in anti-police protest. Central to our thesis is James Scott’s theory of hidden transcripts and the infrapolitics of resistance.",
keywords = "police punishment, (online) resistance, hashtag activism, infrapolitics, hidden transcripts",
author = "Paul Mutsaers and {van Nuenen}, Tom",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
series = "Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies",
number = "164",
pages = "1--20",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Mutsaers, P & van Nuenen, T 2016 'Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest' Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, no. 164, pp. 1-20.

Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest. / Mutsaers, Paul; van Nuenen, Tom.

2016. p. 1-20 (Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies; No. 164).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest

AU - Mutsaers, Paul

AU - van Nuenen, Tom

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Diarmaid Harkin recently called for a theory of police punishment and its public acceptance. He stated that police violence is ‘provided with a warranty of approval and encouragement from larger, aggregate, deeply held emotions and sensibilities’. We lend our support to his demand for a penal theory of police, but disagree in regard to his explanation of the relative quiescence of “the public” in the face of police punishment. We do so on empirical, epistemological and methodological grounds by (1) centralizing anti-police protest and resistance instead of consensus and acceptance of police punishment; (2) raising the epistemological question “how do we know protest/approval?” and (3) addressing the methodological aspects of studying online resistance, or “hashtag activism”, in anti-police protest. Central to our thesis is James Scott’s theory of hidden transcripts and the infrapolitics of resistance.

AB - Diarmaid Harkin recently called for a theory of police punishment and its public acceptance. He stated that police violence is ‘provided with a warranty of approval and encouragement from larger, aggregate, deeply held emotions and sensibilities’. We lend our support to his demand for a penal theory of police, but disagree in regard to his explanation of the relative quiescence of “the public” in the face of police punishment. We do so on empirical, epistemological and methodological grounds by (1) centralizing anti-police protest and resistance instead of consensus and acceptance of police punishment; (2) raising the epistemological question “how do we know protest/approval?” and (3) addressing the methodological aspects of studying online resistance, or “hashtag activism”, in anti-police protest. Central to our thesis is James Scott’s theory of hidden transcripts and the infrapolitics of resistance.

KW - police punishment

KW - (online) resistance

KW - hashtag activism

KW - infrapolitics

KW - hidden transcripts

UR - https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/9f6fac5d-c97a-4d30-9b11-6d6f03bbcfba_TPCS_164_Mutsaers-vNuenen.pdf

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest

ER -

Mutsaers P, van Nuenen T. Police punishment and the infrapolitics of (online) anti-police protest. 2016, p. 1-20. (Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies; 164).