Political extremity, social media use, social support, and well-being for emerging adults during the 2016 presidential election campaign

D.C. Leighton*, M.J. Brandt, L.A. Kennedy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The 2016 U.S. presidential election was marked by hostile political discourse, often on social media, where users were exposed to divergent, and potentially distressing, political discourse. This research explores the effects of this election on the well-being of emerging adults, who receive the majority of their news via social media. Using data from the Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions 2 study, we expected greater social media use to be associated with greater perceived stress, and lower well-being, among emerging adults who are more politically extreme, and expected these relationships would be moderated by social support and social media use. Our pre-registered analysis did not support our hypotheses. Although there were some effects of extremity on stress and well-being, overall the direction of the effects were inconsistent and neither social media use nor social support was found to moderate the effects of extremity on stress and well-being.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEmerging Adulthood
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

election campaign
presidential election
social media
social support
well-being
discourse
adulthood
news
election

Cite this

@article{6074bd3b7518413baf5c104cf803f68d,
title = "Political extremity, social media use, social support, and well-being for emerging adults during the 2016 presidential election campaign",
abstract = "The 2016 U.S. presidential election was marked by hostile political discourse, often on social media, where users were exposed to divergent, and potentially distressing, political discourse. This research explores the effects of this election on the well-being of emerging adults, who receive the majority of their news via social media. Using data from the Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions 2 study, we expected greater social media use to be associated with greater perceived stress, and lower well-being, among emerging adults who are more politically extreme, and expected these relationships would be moderated by social support and social media use. Our pre-registered analysis did not support our hypotheses. Although there were some effects of extremity on stress and well-being, overall the direction of the effects were inconsistent and neither social media use nor social support was found to moderate the effects of extremity on stress and well-being.",
author = "D.C. Leighton and M.J. Brandt and L.A. Kennedy",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/2167696818810618",
language = "English",
journal = "Emerging Adulthood",
issn = "2167-6968",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",

}

Political extremity, social media use, social support, and well-being for emerging adults during the 2016 presidential election campaign. / Leighton, D.C.; Brandt, M.J.; Kennedy, L.A.

In: Emerging Adulthood, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political extremity, social media use, social support, and well-being for emerging adults during the 2016 presidential election campaign

AU - Leighton, D.C.

AU - Brandt, M.J.

AU - Kennedy, L.A.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The 2016 U.S. presidential election was marked by hostile political discourse, often on social media, where users were exposed to divergent, and potentially distressing, political discourse. This research explores the effects of this election on the well-being of emerging adults, who receive the majority of their news via social media. Using data from the Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions 2 study, we expected greater social media use to be associated with greater perceived stress, and lower well-being, among emerging adults who are more politically extreme, and expected these relationships would be moderated by social support and social media use. Our pre-registered analysis did not support our hypotheses. Although there were some effects of extremity on stress and well-being, overall the direction of the effects were inconsistent and neither social media use nor social support was found to moderate the effects of extremity on stress and well-being.

AB - The 2016 U.S. presidential election was marked by hostile political discourse, often on social media, where users were exposed to divergent, and potentially distressing, political discourse. This research explores the effects of this election on the well-being of emerging adults, who receive the majority of their news via social media. Using data from the Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions 2 study, we expected greater social media use to be associated with greater perceived stress, and lower well-being, among emerging adults who are more politically extreme, and expected these relationships would be moderated by social support and social media use. Our pre-registered analysis did not support our hypotheses. Although there were some effects of extremity on stress and well-being, overall the direction of the effects were inconsistent and neither social media use nor social support was found to moderate the effects of extremity on stress and well-being.

U2 - 10.1177/2167696818810618

DO - 10.1177/2167696818810618

M3 - Article

JO - Emerging Adulthood

JF - Emerging Adulthood

SN - 2167-6968

ER -