Abstract
I analyze the relationship between economics and politics across eight parliamentary elections in four transition countries, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. I argue that support for reform reflects the balance between positive and negative effects of the reform. Accordingly, I identify economic groups that support or oppose the reform. The former are private entrepreneurs, white collar workers and university educated voters. The latter are the unemployed, retirees, and blue collar and agricultural workers. This general pattern holds both within countries and across countries, and across tenures of different governments. In contrast with the responsibility hypothesis, voters in the transition countries are found to be forward looking, not retrospective.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | Macroeconomics |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Volume | 1998-98 |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Publication series
| Name | CentER Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 1998-98 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Transition
- economics of voting
- Central and Eastern Europe
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Political Support for Reforms: Economics of Voting in Transition Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver