Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics

Anne Kerr*, Tineke Broer, Emily Ross, Sarah Cunningham Burley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we examine professional discourse around the development of polygenic risk-stratified screening (PRSS) for cancer. Analyzing a range of contemporary professional literatures from Europe, North America and Australia, we explore how the drive to screen for molecular markers of cancer risk makes professionals, screening recipients and publics responsible, in different ways, for acquiring, curating and analyzing molecular data. Investigating how these responsibilities are invoked in discussions of new data practices, technologies, organizational arrangements, engagement, education and protocols for participation, we argue that agendas for PRSS for cancer are both expanding and stratifying responsibilities. Data collection is to be achieved by intensified responsibilities for including, reassuring and recruiting populations, as well as by opening and enriching the datasets on which models and preventative screening arrangements are based. Enhanced responsibilities for screening recipients and publics are also invoked, not just in relation to personal health but for population health more generally, via research participation and consenting to data re-use in the public interest. Professionals, screening recipients and publics are also to become responsible for moderating expectations of screening according to genomic designations. Together these discourses go beyond individual risk management to extend and diversify the responsibilities of practitioners, screening recipients and publics as public health genomics develops.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-626
Number of pages22
JournalSocial studies of science
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • genomics
  • responsibility
  • risk
  • screening
  • stratification
  • GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
  • COLORECTAL-CANCER
  • BREAST
  • SUSCEPTIBILITY
  • EMERGENCE
  • MEDICINE
  • REINSCRIPTION
  • MAMMOGRAPHY
  • INTEGRATION
  • SCIENCE

Cite this

Kerr, Anne ; Broer, Tineke ; Ross, Emily ; Burley, Sarah Cunningham. / Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer : Responsibilization in public health genomics. In: Social studies of science. 2019 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 605-626.
@article{b859017eebc64c2f9ecf50f31eaeace1,
title = "Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics",
abstract = "In this article, we examine professional discourse around the development of polygenic risk-stratified screening (PRSS) for cancer. Analyzing a range of contemporary professional literatures from Europe, North America and Australia, we explore how the drive to screen for molecular markers of cancer risk makes professionals, screening recipients and publics responsible, in different ways, for acquiring, curating and analyzing molecular data. Investigating how these responsibilities are invoked in discussions of new data practices, technologies, organizational arrangements, engagement, education and protocols for participation, we argue that agendas for PRSS for cancer are both expanding and stratifying responsibilities. Data collection is to be achieved by intensified responsibilities for including, reassuring and recruiting populations, as well as by opening and enriching the datasets on which models and preventative screening arrangements are based. Enhanced responsibilities for screening recipients and publics are also invoked, not just in relation to personal health but for population health more generally, via research participation and consenting to data re-use in the public interest. Professionals, screening recipients and publics are also to become responsible for moderating expectations of screening according to genomic designations. Together these discourses go beyond individual risk management to extend and diversify the responsibilities of practitioners, screening recipients and publics as public health genomics develops.",
keywords = "genomics, responsibility, risk, screening, stratification, GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION, COLORECTAL-CANCER, BREAST, SUSCEPTIBILITY, EMERGENCE, MEDICINE, REINSCRIPTION, MAMMOGRAPHY, INTEGRATION, SCIENCE",
author = "Anne Kerr and Tineke Broer and Emily Ross and Burley, {Sarah Cunningham}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0306312719858404",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "605--626",
journal = "Social studies of science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer : Responsibilization in public health genomics. / Kerr, Anne; Broer, Tineke; Ross, Emily; Burley, Sarah Cunningham.

In: Social studies of science, Vol. 49, No. 4, 08.2019, p. 605-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer

T2 - Responsibilization in public health genomics

AU - Kerr, Anne

AU - Broer, Tineke

AU - Ross, Emily

AU - Burley, Sarah Cunningham

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - In this article, we examine professional discourse around the development of polygenic risk-stratified screening (PRSS) for cancer. Analyzing a range of contemporary professional literatures from Europe, North America and Australia, we explore how the drive to screen for molecular markers of cancer risk makes professionals, screening recipients and publics responsible, in different ways, for acquiring, curating and analyzing molecular data. Investigating how these responsibilities are invoked in discussions of new data practices, technologies, organizational arrangements, engagement, education and protocols for participation, we argue that agendas for PRSS for cancer are both expanding and stratifying responsibilities. Data collection is to be achieved by intensified responsibilities for including, reassuring and recruiting populations, as well as by opening and enriching the datasets on which models and preventative screening arrangements are based. Enhanced responsibilities for screening recipients and publics are also invoked, not just in relation to personal health but for population health more generally, via research participation and consenting to data re-use in the public interest. Professionals, screening recipients and publics are also to become responsible for moderating expectations of screening according to genomic designations. Together these discourses go beyond individual risk management to extend and diversify the responsibilities of practitioners, screening recipients and publics as public health genomics develops.

AB - In this article, we examine professional discourse around the development of polygenic risk-stratified screening (PRSS) for cancer. Analyzing a range of contemporary professional literatures from Europe, North America and Australia, we explore how the drive to screen for molecular markers of cancer risk makes professionals, screening recipients and publics responsible, in different ways, for acquiring, curating and analyzing molecular data. Investigating how these responsibilities are invoked in discussions of new data practices, technologies, organizational arrangements, engagement, education and protocols for participation, we argue that agendas for PRSS for cancer are both expanding and stratifying responsibilities. Data collection is to be achieved by intensified responsibilities for including, reassuring and recruiting populations, as well as by opening and enriching the datasets on which models and preventative screening arrangements are based. Enhanced responsibilities for screening recipients and publics are also invoked, not just in relation to personal health but for population health more generally, via research participation and consenting to data re-use in the public interest. Professionals, screening recipients and publics are also to become responsible for moderating expectations of screening according to genomic designations. Together these discourses go beyond individual risk management to extend and diversify the responsibilities of practitioners, screening recipients and publics as public health genomics develops.

KW - genomics

KW - responsibility

KW - risk

KW - screening

KW - stratification

KW - GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION

KW - COLORECTAL-CANCER

KW - BREAST

KW - SUSCEPTIBILITY

KW - EMERGENCE

KW - MEDICINE

KW - REINSCRIPTION

KW - MAMMOGRAPHY

KW - INTEGRATION

KW - SCIENCE

U2 - 10.1177/0306312719858404

DO - 10.1177/0306312719858404

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 605

EP - 626

JO - Social studies of science

JF - Social studies of science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 4

ER -