Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships

J.J. Miranda Sarmento, L.D.R. Renneboog

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper documents the Portuguese experience in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Since 1993, Portugal has been using PPPs intensively, mainly for highway construction and in the health sector. This has enabled the country to close the infrastructure gap and avoid the budget constraints at the moment of the investment. Doubts about whether PPPs represent value-for-money have emerged. There are several reasons why PPP were unsuccessful: (i) the concentration PPP projects was very high over a limited time span and the public sector was not prepared nor had the ability to manage and control the contracts, (ii) the incentive to resort to PPPs was mainly to avoid budget constraints, but not to use of public resources better by taking advantage of private sector efficiency, (iii) the risk allocation between the private and public sector was flawed because the private sector bore too little risk and payments from the public to the private sector were considerably above the investment cost. The current and future annual payments from the state to the private sector are a substantial burden in the current times of austerity and budget consolidation. As the country had to ask the troika (IMF, ECB, and European Commission) for a financial rescue from, PPP renegotiations are ongoing to reduce public payments.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Private Partnership
Subtitle of host publicationA Global Review
EditorsA. Akintoye, M. Beck, M. Kumaraswamy
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis
Pages266-282
ISBN (Print)9780415728966
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Public-private partnerships
Portugal
Private sector
Payment
Budget constraint
Resorts
Value for money
Resources
Highway construction
Burden
Risk allocation
Renegotiation
Consolidation
Incentives
Health sector
Public sector
Public and private sector
Costs
European Commission

Cite this

Miranda Sarmento, J. J., & Renneboog, L. D. R. (2015). Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships. In A. Akintoye, M. Beck, & M. Kumaraswamy (Eds.), Public Private Partnership: A Global Review (pp. 266-282). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Miranda Sarmento, J.J. ; Renneboog, L.D.R. / Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships. Public Private Partnership: A Global Review. editor / A. Akintoye ; M. Beck ; M. Kumaraswamy. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis, 2015. pp. 266-282
@inbook{fcfe5d2e7cad4038b029d363c133d46b,
title = "Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships",
abstract = "This paper documents the Portuguese experience in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Since 1993, Portugal has been using PPPs intensively, mainly for highway construction and in the health sector. This has enabled the country to close the infrastructure gap and avoid the budget constraints at the moment of the investment. Doubts about whether PPPs represent value-for-money have emerged. There are several reasons why PPP were unsuccessful: (i) the concentration PPP projects was very high over a limited time span and the public sector was not prepared nor had the ability to manage and control the contracts, (ii) the incentive to resort to PPPs was mainly to avoid budget constraints, but not to use of public resources better by taking advantage of private sector efficiency, (iii) the risk allocation between the private and public sector was flawed because the private sector bore too little risk and payments from the public to the private sector were considerably above the investment cost. The current and future annual payments from the state to the private sector are a substantial burden in the current times of austerity and budget consolidation. As the country had to ask the troika (IMF, ECB, and European Commission) for a financial rescue from, PPP renegotiations are ongoing to reduce public payments.",
author = "{Miranda Sarmento}, J.J. and L.D.R. Renneboog",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415728966",
pages = "266--282",
editor = "A. Akintoye and M. Beck and M. Kumaraswamy",
booktitle = "Public Private Partnership",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis",

}

Miranda Sarmento, JJ & Renneboog, LDR 2015, Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships. in A Akintoye, M Beck & M Kumaraswamy (eds), Public Private Partnership: A Global Review. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 266-282.

Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships. / Miranda Sarmento, J.J.; Renneboog, L.D.R.

Public Private Partnership: A Global Review. ed. / A. Akintoye; M. Beck; M. Kumaraswamy. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis, 2015. p. 266-282.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships

AU - Miranda Sarmento, J.J.

AU - Renneboog, L.D.R.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - This paper documents the Portuguese experience in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Since 1993, Portugal has been using PPPs intensively, mainly for highway construction and in the health sector. This has enabled the country to close the infrastructure gap and avoid the budget constraints at the moment of the investment. Doubts about whether PPPs represent value-for-money have emerged. There are several reasons why PPP were unsuccessful: (i) the concentration PPP projects was very high over a limited time span and the public sector was not prepared nor had the ability to manage and control the contracts, (ii) the incentive to resort to PPPs was mainly to avoid budget constraints, but not to use of public resources better by taking advantage of private sector efficiency, (iii) the risk allocation between the private and public sector was flawed because the private sector bore too little risk and payments from the public to the private sector were considerably above the investment cost. The current and future annual payments from the state to the private sector are a substantial burden in the current times of austerity and budget consolidation. As the country had to ask the troika (IMF, ECB, and European Commission) for a financial rescue from, PPP renegotiations are ongoing to reduce public payments.

AB - This paper documents the Portuguese experience in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). Since 1993, Portugal has been using PPPs intensively, mainly for highway construction and in the health sector. This has enabled the country to close the infrastructure gap and avoid the budget constraints at the moment of the investment. Doubts about whether PPPs represent value-for-money have emerged. There are several reasons why PPP were unsuccessful: (i) the concentration PPP projects was very high over a limited time span and the public sector was not prepared nor had the ability to manage and control the contracts, (ii) the incentive to resort to PPPs was mainly to avoid budget constraints, but not to use of public resources better by taking advantage of private sector efficiency, (iii) the risk allocation between the private and public sector was flawed because the private sector bore too little risk and payments from the public to the private sector were considerably above the investment cost. The current and future annual payments from the state to the private sector are a substantial burden in the current times of austerity and budget consolidation. As the country had to ask the troika (IMF, ECB, and European Commission) for a financial rescue from, PPP renegotiations are ongoing to reduce public payments.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780415728966

SP - 266

EP - 282

BT - Public Private Partnership

A2 - Akintoye, A.

A2 - Beck, M.

A2 - Kumaraswamy, M.

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis

CY - London

ER -

Miranda Sarmento JJ, Renneboog LDR. Portugal's experience with public-private partnerships. In Akintoye A, Beck M, Kumaraswamy M, editors, Public Private Partnership: A Global Review. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis. 2015. p. 266-282