Power gets the job

Priming power improves interview outcomes

J. Lammers, D. Dubois, D.D. Rucker, A.D. Galinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The current research explores whether momentary changes in power can shift professional interview outcomes. Two experiments manipulated power by asking applicants to recall a time they had or lacked power prior to writing a job application letter (Experiment 1) or being interviewed for admission to business schools (Experiment 2). Independent judges, who were unaware of the applicants' experimental condition or even the existence of the power manipulation, significantly preferred the written and face-to-face interview performance of powerful applicants to that of powerless (Experiments 1 and 2) or power-neutral applicants (Experiment 2). In addition, the judges' preference for power-primed applicants was mediated by perceptions of the applicant's persuasiveness. Overall, merely asking participants to remember a personal experience with power dramatically affected the impressions that interviewers had of them. Our findings illustrate power's far-reaching effects and have potentially important implications for understanding the psychology of job interviews.
Highlights
► Priming participants with feelings of power improves professional interview outcomes.
► In two studies, participants wrote application letters and attended 15-minute job interviews.
► In both studies, unaware judges significantly preferred the power-primed applicants.
Keywords: Power, Application, Job-interview
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)776-779
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Interviews
applicant
interview
job interview
Job Application
experiment
change in power
business school
manipulation
psychology
performance
experience

Cite this

Lammers, J. ; Dubois, D. ; Rucker, D.D. ; Galinsky, A.D. / Power gets the job : Priming power improves interview outcomes. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 776-779.
@article{3ed29ec205794487915fe68312a64884,
title = "Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes",
abstract = "The current research explores whether momentary changes in power can shift professional interview outcomes. Two experiments manipulated power by asking applicants to recall a time they had or lacked power prior to writing a job application letter (Experiment 1) or being interviewed for admission to business schools (Experiment 2). Independent judges, who were unaware of the applicants' experimental condition or even the existence of the power manipulation, significantly preferred the written and face-to-face interview performance of powerful applicants to that of powerless (Experiments 1 and 2) or power-neutral applicants (Experiment 2). In addition, the judges' preference for power-primed applicants was mediated by perceptions of the applicant's persuasiveness. Overall, merely asking participants to remember a personal experience with power dramatically affected the impressions that interviewers had of them. Our findings illustrate power's far-reaching effects and have potentially important implications for understanding the psychology of job interviews.Highlights► Priming participants with feelings of power improves professional interview outcomes. ► In two studies, participants wrote application letters and attended 15-minute job interviews. ► In both studies, unaware judges significantly preferred the power-primed applicants.Keywords: Power, Application, Job-interview",
author = "J. Lammers and D. Dubois and D.D. Rucker and A.D. Galinsky",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "776--779",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "4",

}

Power gets the job : Priming power improves interview outcomes. / Lammers, J.; Dubois, D.; Rucker, D.D.; Galinsky, A.D.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, p. 776-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power gets the job

T2 - Priming power improves interview outcomes

AU - Lammers, J.

AU - Dubois, D.

AU - Rucker, D.D.

AU - Galinsky, A.D.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The current research explores whether momentary changes in power can shift professional interview outcomes. Two experiments manipulated power by asking applicants to recall a time they had or lacked power prior to writing a job application letter (Experiment 1) or being interviewed for admission to business schools (Experiment 2). Independent judges, who were unaware of the applicants' experimental condition or even the existence of the power manipulation, significantly preferred the written and face-to-face interview performance of powerful applicants to that of powerless (Experiments 1 and 2) or power-neutral applicants (Experiment 2). In addition, the judges' preference for power-primed applicants was mediated by perceptions of the applicant's persuasiveness. Overall, merely asking participants to remember a personal experience with power dramatically affected the impressions that interviewers had of them. Our findings illustrate power's far-reaching effects and have potentially important implications for understanding the psychology of job interviews.Highlights► Priming participants with feelings of power improves professional interview outcomes. ► In two studies, participants wrote application letters and attended 15-minute job interviews. ► In both studies, unaware judges significantly preferred the power-primed applicants.Keywords: Power, Application, Job-interview

AB - The current research explores whether momentary changes in power can shift professional interview outcomes. Two experiments manipulated power by asking applicants to recall a time they had or lacked power prior to writing a job application letter (Experiment 1) or being interviewed for admission to business schools (Experiment 2). Independent judges, who were unaware of the applicants' experimental condition or even the existence of the power manipulation, significantly preferred the written and face-to-face interview performance of powerful applicants to that of powerless (Experiments 1 and 2) or power-neutral applicants (Experiment 2). In addition, the judges' preference for power-primed applicants was mediated by perceptions of the applicant's persuasiveness. Overall, merely asking participants to remember a personal experience with power dramatically affected the impressions that interviewers had of them. Our findings illustrate power's far-reaching effects and have potentially important implications for understanding the psychology of job interviews.Highlights► Priming participants with feelings of power improves professional interview outcomes. ► In two studies, participants wrote application letters and attended 15-minute job interviews. ► In both studies, unaware judges significantly preferred the power-primed applicants.Keywords: Power, Application, Job-interview

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 776

EP - 779

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 4

ER -