Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: Empirical data from the Netherlands

L. Lopes de Leao Laguna, Martha Meerman, R.F. Poell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in and literature regarding practitioner research in human resources (HR), not much is known about the factors that play a role in the actual practice by HR practitioners. This article describes an explorative study to gain empirical insight into the use and quality of practitioner research in HR practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 Dutch HR practitioners from diverse backgrounds, posing questions about (1) their definitions of practitioner research, (2) the characteristics of the research they perform, (3) the quality and usability of the research projects in which they have taken part, and (4) the forces that drive or hinder practitioner research. We constructed theory-based coding schemes to analyse the data. To assess the quality and usability of the research performed by participants, we constructed a quality framework. Our findings show that all participants were more or less involved in HR-related practitioner research, but the quality and usability of that research could be improved. We report several causes and influencing factors. Our findings complement previous research on evidence-based HR and other practitioner research approaches and provide new insights. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for further research and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-90
JournalHuman Resource Development International
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Empirical data
Professionalization
Human resource practices
The Netherlands
Human resources
Usability
Influencing factors
Evidence-based
Structured interview
Factors

Keywords

  • INDUSTRIAL
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • MANAGEMENT
  • PSYCHOLOGY
  • Practitioner research
  • critical thinking
  • human resource management
  • professionalization
  • scholar-practitioner
  • validity

Cite this

@article{0e24c911a22542cda455db96fefd567e,
title = "Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: Empirical data from the Netherlands",
abstract = "Despite the growing interest in and literature regarding practitioner research in human resources (HR), not much is known about the factors that play a role in the actual practice by HR practitioners. This article describes an explorative study to gain empirical insight into the use and quality of practitioner research in HR practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 Dutch HR practitioners from diverse backgrounds, posing questions about (1) their definitions of practitioner research, (2) the characteristics of the research they perform, (3) the quality and usability of the research projects in which they have taken part, and (4) the forces that drive or hinder practitioner research. We constructed theory-based coding schemes to analyse the data. To assess the quality and usability of the research performed by participants, we constructed a quality framework. Our findings show that all participants were more or less involved in HR-related practitioner research, but the quality and usability of that research could be improved. We report several causes and influencing factors. Our findings complement previous research on evidence-based HR and other practitioner research approaches and provide new insights. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for further research and practice.",
keywords = "INDUSTRIAL, KNOWLEDGE, MANAGEMENT, PSYCHOLOGY, Practitioner research, critical thinking, human resource management, professionalization, scholar-practitioner, validity",
author = "{Lopes de Leao Laguna}, L. and Martha Meerman and R.F. Poell",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13678868.2018.1483150",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "68--90",
journal = "Human Resource Development International",
issn = "1367-8868",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice : Empirical data from the Netherlands. / Lopes de Leao Laguna, L.; Meerman, Martha; Poell, R.F.

In: Human Resource Development International, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2019, p. 68-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice

T2 - Empirical data from the Netherlands

AU - Lopes de Leao Laguna, L.

AU - Meerman, Martha

AU - Poell, R.F.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Despite the growing interest in and literature regarding practitioner research in human resources (HR), not much is known about the factors that play a role in the actual practice by HR practitioners. This article describes an explorative study to gain empirical insight into the use and quality of practitioner research in HR practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 Dutch HR practitioners from diverse backgrounds, posing questions about (1) their definitions of practitioner research, (2) the characteristics of the research they perform, (3) the quality and usability of the research projects in which they have taken part, and (4) the forces that drive or hinder practitioner research. We constructed theory-based coding schemes to analyse the data. To assess the quality and usability of the research performed by participants, we constructed a quality framework. Our findings show that all participants were more or less involved in HR-related practitioner research, but the quality and usability of that research could be improved. We report several causes and influencing factors. Our findings complement previous research on evidence-based HR and other practitioner research approaches and provide new insights. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for further research and practice.

AB - Despite the growing interest in and literature regarding practitioner research in human resources (HR), not much is known about the factors that play a role in the actual practice by HR practitioners. This article describes an explorative study to gain empirical insight into the use and quality of practitioner research in HR practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 Dutch HR practitioners from diverse backgrounds, posing questions about (1) their definitions of practitioner research, (2) the characteristics of the research they perform, (3) the quality and usability of the research projects in which they have taken part, and (4) the forces that drive or hinder practitioner research. We constructed theory-based coding schemes to analyse the data. To assess the quality and usability of the research performed by participants, we constructed a quality framework. Our findings show that all participants were more or less involved in HR-related practitioner research, but the quality and usability of that research could be improved. We report several causes and influencing factors. Our findings complement previous research on evidence-based HR and other practitioner research approaches and provide new insights. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for further research and practice.

KW - INDUSTRIAL

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - PSYCHOLOGY

KW - Practitioner research

KW - critical thinking

KW - human resource management

KW - professionalization

KW - scholar-practitioner

KW - validity

UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F13678868.2018.1483150

U2 - 10.1080/13678868.2018.1483150

DO - 10.1080/13678868.2018.1483150

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 68

EP - 90

JO - Human Resource Development International

JF - Human Resource Development International

SN - 1367-8868

IS - 1

ER -