Predictably angry

Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior

Boris van Leeuwen, Charles Noussair, T.J.S. Offerman, Sigrid Suetens, C.M. van Veelen, J. van de Ven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Evolutionary explanations of anger as a commitment device hinge on two key assumptions. The first is that it is predictable, ex ante, whether someone will get angry when feeling that he or she has been badly treated. The second is that anger is associated with destructive behavior. We test the validity of these two assumptions. We collected photos of responders in an ultimatum game before they were informed about the game that they would be playing, and we filmed responders with webcams during play. We then showed pairs of photos consisting of one responder who rejected and one responder who accepted (a low offer) to an independent group of observers. We find that observers are better than chance at detecting who rejected the low offer; they do 10% better than random guessing would. We also find that anger at receiving a low offer is associated with rejection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3352-3364
JournalManagement Science
Volume64
Issue number7
Early online date27 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Anger
Observer
Ultimatum game
Evolutionary

Keywords

  • anger
  • commitment
  • facial cues
  • ultimatum game

Cite this

van Leeuwen, Boris ; Noussair, Charles ; Offerman, T.J.S. ; Suetens, Sigrid ; van Veelen, C.M. ; van de Ven, J. / Predictably angry : Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior . In: Management Science. 2018 ; Vol. 64, No. 7. pp. 3352-3364.
@article{a98bea2f9961409e97d89905037e83f5,
title = "Predictably angry: Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior",
abstract = "Evolutionary explanations of anger as a commitment device hinge on two key assumptions. The first is that it is predictable, ex ante, whether someone will get angry when feeling that he or she has been badly treated. The second is that anger is associated with destructive behavior. We test the validity of these two assumptions. We collected photos of responders in an ultimatum game before they were informed about the game that they would be playing, and we filmed responders with webcams during play. We then showed pairs of photos consisting of one responder who rejected and one responder who accepted (a low offer) to an independent group of observers. We find that observers are better than chance at detecting who rejected the low offer; they do 10{\%} better than random guessing would. We also find that anger at receiving a low offer is associated with rejection.",
keywords = "anger, commitment, facial cues, ultimatum game",
author = "{van Leeuwen}, Boris and Charles Noussair and T.J.S. Offerman and Sigrid Suetens and {van Veelen}, C.M. and {van de Ven}, J.",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2017.2727",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "3352--3364",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "7",

}

Predictably angry : Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior . / van Leeuwen, Boris; Noussair, Charles; Offerman, T.J.S.; Suetens, Sigrid; van Veelen, C.M.; van de Ven, J.

In: Management Science, Vol. 64, No. 7, 07.2018, p. 3352-3364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictably angry

T2 - Facial cues provide a credible signal of destructive behavior

AU - van Leeuwen, Boris

AU - Noussair, Charles

AU - Offerman, T.J.S.

AU - Suetens, Sigrid

AU - van Veelen, C.M.

AU - van de Ven, J.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Evolutionary explanations of anger as a commitment device hinge on two key assumptions. The first is that it is predictable, ex ante, whether someone will get angry when feeling that he or she has been badly treated. The second is that anger is associated with destructive behavior. We test the validity of these two assumptions. We collected photos of responders in an ultimatum game before they were informed about the game that they would be playing, and we filmed responders with webcams during play. We then showed pairs of photos consisting of one responder who rejected and one responder who accepted (a low offer) to an independent group of observers. We find that observers are better than chance at detecting who rejected the low offer; they do 10% better than random guessing would. We also find that anger at receiving a low offer is associated with rejection.

AB - Evolutionary explanations of anger as a commitment device hinge on two key assumptions. The first is that it is predictable, ex ante, whether someone will get angry when feeling that he or she has been badly treated. The second is that anger is associated with destructive behavior. We test the validity of these two assumptions. We collected photos of responders in an ultimatum game before they were informed about the game that they would be playing, and we filmed responders with webcams during play. We then showed pairs of photos consisting of one responder who rejected and one responder who accepted (a low offer) to an independent group of observers. We find that observers are better than chance at detecting who rejected the low offer; they do 10% better than random guessing would. We also find that anger at receiving a low offer is associated with rejection.

KW - anger

KW - commitment

KW - facial cues

KW - ultimatum game

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2727

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2727

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 3352

EP - 3364

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 7

ER -