Predicting ideological prejudice

M.J. Brandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)
115 Downloads (Pure)


A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-722
JournalPsychological Science
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting ideological prejudice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this