Predicting ideological prejudice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-722
JournalPsychological Science
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Brandt, M.J. / Predicting ideological prejudice. In: Psychological Science. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 713-722.
@article{62e1348d9781473391280af58d0f7059,
title = "Predicting ideological prejudice",
abstract = "A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.",
author = "M.J. Brandt",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0956797617693004",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "713--722",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Predicting ideological prejudice. / Brandt, M.J.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2017, p. 713-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting ideological prejudice

AU - Brandt, M.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.

AB - A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.

U2 - 10.1177/0956797617693004

DO - 10.1177/0956797617693004

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 713

EP - 722

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 6

ER -