Predictive language processing revealing usage-based variation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While theories on predictive processing posit that predictions are based on one’s prior experiences, experimental work has effectively ignored the fact that people differ from each other in their linguistic experiences and, consequently, in the predictions they generate. We examine usage-based variation by means of three groups of participants (recruiters, job-seekers, and people not (yet) looking for a job), two stimuli sets (word sequences characteristic of either job ads or news reports), and two experiments (a Completion task and a Voice Onset Time task). We show that differences in experiences with a particular register result in different expectations regarding word sequences characteristic of that register, thus pointing to differences in mental representations of language. Subsequently, we investigate to what extent different operationalizations of word predictability are accurate predictors of voice onset times. A measure of a participant’s own expectations proves to be a significant predictor of processing speed over and above word predictability measures based on amalgamated data. These findings point to actual individual differences and highlight the merits of going beyond amalgamated data. We thus demonstrate that is it feasible to empirically assess the variation implied in usage-based theories, and we advocate exploiting this opportunity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages329-373
Number of pages45
JournalLanguage and Cognition
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 4 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

language
job seeker
news report
experience
operationalization
stimulus
linguistics
experiment
Group
time

Keywords

  • individual differences
  • surprisal
  • cloze probabilities
  • completion task
  • voice onset times

Cite this

@article{48c1ef1f26e7429392de0ab5b1f008d6,
title = "Predictive language processing revealing usage-based variation",
abstract = "While theories on predictive processing posit that predictions are based on one’s prior experiences, experimental work has effectively ignored the fact that people differ from each other in their linguistic experiences and, consequently, in the predictions they generate. We examine usage-based variation by means of three groups of participants (recruiters, job-seekers, and people not (yet) looking for a job), two stimuli sets (word sequences characteristic of either job ads or news reports), and two experiments (a Completion task and a Voice Onset Time task). We show that differences in experiences with a particular register result in different expectations regarding word sequences characteristic of that register, thus pointing to differences in mental representations of language. Subsequently, we investigate to what extent different operationalizations of word predictability are accurate predictors of voice onset times. A measure of a participant’s own expectations proves to be a significant predictor of processing speed over and above word predictability measures based on amalgamated data. These findings point to actual individual differences and highlight the merits of going beyond amalgamated data. We thus demonstrate that is it feasible to empirically assess the variation implied in usage-based theories, and we advocate exploiting this opportunity.",
keywords = "individual differences, surprisal, cloze probabilities, completion task, voice onset times",
author = "V{\'e}ronique Verhagen and Maria Mos and Albert Backus and Joost Schilperoord",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1017/langcog.2018.4",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "329--373",
journal = "Language and Cognition",
issn = "1866-9859",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Predictive language processing revealing usage-based variation. / Verhagen, Véronique; Mos, Maria; Backus, Albert; Schilperoord, Joost.

In: Language and Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 2, 04.06.2018, p. 329-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive language processing revealing usage-based variation

AU - Verhagen,Véronique

AU - Mos,Maria

AU - Backus,Albert

AU - Schilperoord,Joost

PY - 2018/6/4

Y1 - 2018/6/4

N2 - While theories on predictive processing posit that predictions are based on one’s prior experiences, experimental work has effectively ignored the fact that people differ from each other in their linguistic experiences and, consequently, in the predictions they generate. We examine usage-based variation by means of three groups of participants (recruiters, job-seekers, and people not (yet) looking for a job), two stimuli sets (word sequences characteristic of either job ads or news reports), and two experiments (a Completion task and a Voice Onset Time task). We show that differences in experiences with a particular register result in different expectations regarding word sequences characteristic of that register, thus pointing to differences in mental representations of language. Subsequently, we investigate to what extent different operationalizations of word predictability are accurate predictors of voice onset times. A measure of a participant’s own expectations proves to be a significant predictor of processing speed over and above word predictability measures based on amalgamated data. These findings point to actual individual differences and highlight the merits of going beyond amalgamated data. We thus demonstrate that is it feasible to empirically assess the variation implied in usage-based theories, and we advocate exploiting this opportunity.

AB - While theories on predictive processing posit that predictions are based on one’s prior experiences, experimental work has effectively ignored the fact that people differ from each other in their linguistic experiences and, consequently, in the predictions they generate. We examine usage-based variation by means of three groups of participants (recruiters, job-seekers, and people not (yet) looking for a job), two stimuli sets (word sequences characteristic of either job ads or news reports), and two experiments (a Completion task and a Voice Onset Time task). We show that differences in experiences with a particular register result in different expectations regarding word sequences characteristic of that register, thus pointing to differences in mental representations of language. Subsequently, we investigate to what extent different operationalizations of word predictability are accurate predictors of voice onset times. A measure of a participant’s own expectations proves to be a significant predictor of processing speed over and above word predictability measures based on amalgamated data. These findings point to actual individual differences and highlight the merits of going beyond amalgamated data. We thus demonstrate that is it feasible to empirically assess the variation implied in usage-based theories, and we advocate exploiting this opportunity.

KW - individual differences

KW - surprisal

KW - cloze probabilities

KW - completion task

KW - voice onset times

U2 - 10.1017/langcog.2018.4

DO - 10.1017/langcog.2018.4

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 329

EP - 373

JO - Language and Cognition

T2 - Language and Cognition

JF - Language and Cognition

SN - 1866-9859

IS - 2

ER -