Preference reversal for copycat brands

Uncertainty makes imitation feel good

F. van Horen, R. Pieters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Copycat brands try to entice consumers by imitating the trade-dress of leading brands. Recent research suggests that preferences for copycat brands relative to more differentiated brands are generally lower. That is, consumers tend to dislike such “imitation” brands, because of psychological reactance. Three experiments provide evidence in support of the counter hypothesis that preferences for copycats, rather than being generally negative, critically depend on consumers’ uncertainty. When uncertainty about product quality is low, people dislike copycat brands, but this preference reverses when uncertainty is high – despite awareness of the imitation tactics being used. We speculate that this preference reversal occurs because the familiar feel of the copycat is interpreted positively when being uncertain, but negatively when being certain. This double-edged effect of brand similarity has implications for preference theory, consumer decision-making, and managerial practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-64
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

imitation
uncertainty
reactance
tactics
Imitation
Uncertainty
Preference reversal
decision making
experiment
evidence

Cite this

@article{fffdd39c85a44aeeb6986b274f4616d1,
title = "Preference reversal for copycat brands: Uncertainty makes imitation feel good",
abstract = "Copycat brands try to entice consumers by imitating the trade-dress of leading brands. Recent research suggests that preferences for copycat brands relative to more differentiated brands are generally lower. That is, consumers tend to dislike such “imitation” brands, because of psychological reactance. Three experiments provide evidence in support of the counter hypothesis that preferences for copycats, rather than being generally negative, critically depend on consumers’ uncertainty. When uncertainty about product quality is low, people dislike copycat brands, but this preference reverses when uncertainty is high – despite awareness of the imitation tactics being used. We speculate that this preference reversal occurs because the familiar feel of the copycat is interpreted positively when being uncertain, but negatively when being certain. This double-edged effect of brand similarity has implications for preference theory, consumer decision-making, and managerial practice.",
author = "{van Horen}, F. and R. Pieters",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "54--64",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

Preference reversal for copycat brands : Uncertainty makes imitation feel good. / van Horen, F.; Pieters, R.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 37, 2013, p. 54-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preference reversal for copycat brands

T2 - Uncertainty makes imitation feel good

AU - van Horen, F.

AU - Pieters, R.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Copycat brands try to entice consumers by imitating the trade-dress of leading brands. Recent research suggests that preferences for copycat brands relative to more differentiated brands are generally lower. That is, consumers tend to dislike such “imitation” brands, because of psychological reactance. Three experiments provide evidence in support of the counter hypothesis that preferences for copycats, rather than being generally negative, critically depend on consumers’ uncertainty. When uncertainty about product quality is low, people dislike copycat brands, but this preference reverses when uncertainty is high – despite awareness of the imitation tactics being used. We speculate that this preference reversal occurs because the familiar feel of the copycat is interpreted positively when being uncertain, but negatively when being certain. This double-edged effect of brand similarity has implications for preference theory, consumer decision-making, and managerial practice.

AB - Copycat brands try to entice consumers by imitating the trade-dress of leading brands. Recent research suggests that preferences for copycat brands relative to more differentiated brands are generally lower. That is, consumers tend to dislike such “imitation” brands, because of psychological reactance. Three experiments provide evidence in support of the counter hypothesis that preferences for copycats, rather than being generally negative, critically depend on consumers’ uncertainty. When uncertainty about product quality is low, people dislike copycat brands, but this preference reverses when uncertainty is high – despite awareness of the imitation tactics being used. We speculate that this preference reversal occurs because the familiar feel of the copycat is interpreted positively when being uncertain, but negatively when being certain. This double-edged effect of brand similarity has implications for preference theory, consumer decision-making, and managerial practice.

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 54

EP - 64

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

ER -