Presence, proximity and participation: Online court communication from a procedural justice perspective

Paolo Belloni*, Emma Jaspaert, Dorris de Vocht

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The increasing use of video-links has sparked debate on whether online proceedings can ensure fair trials. Legal research often claims that physical presence is essential for legitimacy and effective participation but fails to support this assumption with an empirical basis. This article explores the role of physical presence in criminal trials through procedural justice theory, focusing on perceptions of voice (telling one’s side of the story) and respect (being treated with dignity), to assess how online trials might affect these aspects. Findings on meaningful participation in online hearings are mixed, but research on telepsychology and telemedicine suggest that high levels of empathy and strong working relationships can be maintained. The authors highlight the need for further empirical studies on how online trials influence perceptions of fairness, especially regarding judicial empathy and interpersonal dynamics, and stress
the importance of adopting a receptive mindset toward the new opportunities online criminal proceedings may present in this regard.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-186
Number of pages33
JournalEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Volume33
Issue number1-2
Early online date27 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • online courts
  • effective participation
  • procedural justice
  • voice
  • respect
  • in court communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Presence, proximity and participation: Online court communication from a procedural justice perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this