Prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in the Netherlands

Ethnic differences?

P. Okur, L.M. van der Knaap, S. Bogaerts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In most epidemiological prevalence studies of child sexual abuse, the role of ethnicity remains unclear. This study examined the prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in four non-Western ethnic minority groups and compared them with a native Dutch group. A sample of 3,426 young adults (aged 18–25) completed a structured, online survey on experiences of child sexual abuse. A total of 42.9% (n = 1,469) participants reported at least one form of child sexual abuse victimization before the age of 18. Surinamese and Turkish respondents’ prevalence rates did not differ from the native Dutch youth. However, the Dutch Antillean respondents reported significantly higher rates of child sexual abuse on specific forms of abuse, whereas the Moroccan respondents reported lower rates compared with their native Dutch peers. With this study, we have more insight into the differences—however small they may be—between ethnic groups and native Dutch youth regarding child sexual abuse.
Keywords: child molestation, ethnic minorities, cross-cultural, quantitative, self-report
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
JournalJournal of Child Sexual Abuse
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Sexual Child Abuse
Netherlands
Cross-Sectional Studies
Minority Groups
Crime Victims
Self Report
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{ab7cc08427fd4f99bfbeef86b97bfa92,
title = "Prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in the Netherlands: Ethnic differences?",
abstract = "In most epidemiological prevalence studies of child sexual abuse, the role of ethnicity remains unclear. This study examined the prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in four non-Western ethnic minority groups and compared them with a native Dutch group. A sample of 3,426 young adults (aged 18–25) completed a structured, online survey on experiences of child sexual abuse. A total of 42.9{\%} (n = 1,469) participants reported at least one form of child sexual abuse victimization before the age of 18. Surinamese and Turkish respondents’ prevalence rates did not differ from the native Dutch youth. However, the Dutch Antillean respondents reported significantly higher rates of child sexual abuse on specific forms of abuse, whereas the Moroccan respondents reported lower rates compared with their native Dutch peers. With this study, we have more insight into the differences—however small they may be—between ethnic groups and native Dutch youth regarding child sexual abuse.Keywords: child molestation, ethnic minorities, cross-cultural, quantitative, self-report",
author = "P. Okur and {van der Knaap}, L.M. and S. Bogaerts",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/10538712.2015.971925",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Journal of Child Sexual Abuse",
issn = "1053-8712",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in the Netherlands : Ethnic differences? / Okur, P.; van der Knaap, L.M.; Bogaerts, S.

In: Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in the Netherlands

T2 - Ethnic differences?

AU - Okur, P.

AU - van der Knaap, L.M.

AU - Bogaerts, S.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In most epidemiological prevalence studies of child sexual abuse, the role of ethnicity remains unclear. This study examined the prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in four non-Western ethnic minority groups and compared them with a native Dutch group. A sample of 3,426 young adults (aged 18–25) completed a structured, online survey on experiences of child sexual abuse. A total of 42.9% (n = 1,469) participants reported at least one form of child sexual abuse victimization before the age of 18. Surinamese and Turkish respondents’ prevalence rates did not differ from the native Dutch youth. However, the Dutch Antillean respondents reported significantly higher rates of child sexual abuse on specific forms of abuse, whereas the Moroccan respondents reported lower rates compared with their native Dutch peers. With this study, we have more insight into the differences—however small they may be—between ethnic groups and native Dutch youth regarding child sexual abuse.Keywords: child molestation, ethnic minorities, cross-cultural, quantitative, self-report

AB - In most epidemiological prevalence studies of child sexual abuse, the role of ethnicity remains unclear. This study examined the prevalence and nature of child sexual abuse in four non-Western ethnic minority groups and compared them with a native Dutch group. A sample of 3,426 young adults (aged 18–25) completed a structured, online survey on experiences of child sexual abuse. A total of 42.9% (n = 1,469) participants reported at least one form of child sexual abuse victimization before the age of 18. Surinamese and Turkish respondents’ prevalence rates did not differ from the native Dutch youth. However, the Dutch Antillean respondents reported significantly higher rates of child sexual abuse on specific forms of abuse, whereas the Moroccan respondents reported lower rates compared with their native Dutch peers. With this study, we have more insight into the differences—however small they may be—between ethnic groups and native Dutch youth regarding child sexual abuse.Keywords: child molestation, ethnic minorities, cross-cultural, quantitative, self-report

U2 - 10.1080/10538712.2015.971925

DO - 10.1080/10538712.2015.971925

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

JF - Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

SN - 1053-8712

IS - 1

ER -