Abstract
Abstract: This paper is a comment on Ronald Gilson and Alan Schwarz “Constraints on Private Benefits of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms versus Ex Post Transaction Review”. Together with that paper it will appear in the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 169 (1) in 2013, in a special issue devoted to Behavioral Theory of Institutions. I argue that the arguments of Gilson and Schwarz are convincing, but that the underlying assumptions may be stronger than the authors suggest. In particular, the G&S paper adopts a US shareholder perspective on corporate governance and is based on standard rationality assumptions. In this comment, I discuss whether and to what extent the recommendations are relevant in the EU context and whether the paper’s conclusions are robust when insights from behavioral economics are included.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | TILEC |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Volume | 2012-038 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Publication series
| Name | TILEC Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2012-038 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Corporate Governance
- Behavioral Economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Preventing Abuse by Controlling Shareholders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver