Private governance as regulatory substitute or complement? A comparative institutional approach to CSR adoption by multinational corporations

Gregory Jackson, Nikolas Rathert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multinational corporations (MNCs) utilize corporate social responsibility (CSR) to govern their global economic activities. Yet CSR adoption is influenced by institutional diversity of both home and host countries. This article uses neoinstitutional and comparative capitalism theories to understand how CSR is shaped by different forms of stakeholder salience in diverse institutional contexts. Using data on labor rights CSR adoption by 629 European MNCs, our empirical results indicate that CSR complements institutionalized stakeholder power in home countries, but substitutes for its absence in host countries. Hence, CSR may paradoxically legitimate MNC behavior given both the presence and absence of stakeholder rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-478
JournalResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Private governance as regulatory substitute or complement? A comparative institutional approach to CSR adoption by multinational corporations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this