Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Problem-solution co-evolution research in the DRS conference community (2001-2025)

  • Michael Mose Biskjaer*
  • , Kim Halskov
  • , Alwin de Rooij
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The problem–solution co-evolution model proposed by Dorst and Cross (2001) remains highly influential for understanding design processes. This paper contributes a scoping review of DRS conference proceedings (2001-2025), revealing how the model has been adopted, developed, and critiqued. A thematic synthesis of a corpus of sixteen DRS papers shows how the model has been used to frame, connect, and extend foundational design theories by pointing to the crucial role of mutual adaptation of problem and solution. We find that problem and solution spaces are considered distinct and interdependent. Co-evolution is conceptualized and studied through several conceptual lenses, e.g., cognitive, social, and systemic, based on a pluralistic, yet interwoven collection of classic design theory. We discuss how problem–solution co-evolution research might be advanced through 1) design space representation and visualization, 2) co-evolution seen as a flexible boundary concept, and 3) psychological creativity research on problem construction.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Mar 2026
EventDesign Research Society Conference 2026 - University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jun 202612 Jun 2026
https://drs2026.thedrs.org/

Conference

ConferenceDesign Research Society Conference 2026
Abbreviated titleDRS2026
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period8/06/2612/06/26
Internet address

Keywords

  • Problem space
  • Design space
  • Solution space
  • Co-evolution
  • Design theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Problem-solution co-evolution research in the DRS conference community (2001-2025)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this