Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: A systematic review

B.M. Havermans, Roosmarijn Mc Schlevis, Cécile Rl Boot, E.P.M. Brouwers, Johannes R Anema, Allard J van der Beek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: 

This systematic review aimed to explore which process variables are used in stress management intervention (SMI) evaluation research.

Methods: 

A systematic review was conducted using seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on an SMI aimed at primary or secondary stress prevention, were directed at paid employees, and reported process data. Two independent researchers checked all records and selected the articles for inclusion. Nielsen and Randall's model for process evaluation was used to cluster the process variables. The three main clusters were context, intervention, and mental models.

Results: 

In the 44 articles included, 47 process variables were found, clustered into three main categories: context (two variables), intervention (31 variables), and mental models (14 variables). Half of the articles contained no reference to process evaluation literature. The collection of process evaluation data mostly took place after the intervention and at the level of the employee.

Conclusions: 

The findings suggest that there is great heterogeneity in methods and process variables used in process evaluations of SMI. This, together with the lack of use of a standardized framework for evaluation, hinders the advancement of process evaluation theory development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-381
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Databases

Cite this

Havermans, B.M. ; Schlevis, Roosmarijn Mc ; Boot, Cécile Rl ; Brouwers, E.P.M. ; Anema, Johannes R ; van der Beek, Allard J. / Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research : A systematic review. In: Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 5. pp. 371-381.
@article{f4aa013f8192449884ff4a523edd9a2c,
title = "Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives: This systematic review aimed to explore which process variables are used in stress management intervention (SMI) evaluation research.Methods: A systematic review was conducted using seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on an SMI aimed at primary or secondary stress prevention, were directed at paid employees, and reported process data. Two independent researchers checked all records and selected the articles for inclusion. Nielsen and Randall's model for process evaluation was used to cluster the process variables. The three main clusters were context, intervention, and mental models.Results: In the 44 articles included, 47 process variables were found, clustered into three main categories: context (two variables), intervention (31 variables), and mental models (14 variables). Half of the articles contained no reference to process evaluation literature. The collection of process evaluation data mostly took place after the intervention and at the level of the employee.Conclusions: The findings suggest that there is great heterogeneity in methods and process variables used in process evaluations of SMI. This, together with the lack of use of a standardized framework for evaluation, hinders the advancement of process evaluation theory development.",
author = "B.M. Havermans and Schlevis, {Roosmarijn Mc} and Boot, {C{\'e}cile Rl} and E.P.M. Brouwers and Anema, {Johannes R} and {van der Beek}, {Allard J}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.5271/sjweh.3570",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "371--381",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health",
issn = "0355-3140",
publisher = "Finnish Institute of Occupational Health",
number = "5",

}

Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research : A systematic review. / Havermans, B.M.; Schlevis, Roosmarijn Mc; Boot, Cécile Rl; Brouwers, E.P.M.; Anema, Johannes R; van der Beek, Allard J.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2016, p. 371-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Havermans, B.M.

AU - Schlevis, Roosmarijn Mc

AU - Boot, Cécile Rl

AU - Brouwers, E.P.M.

AU - Anema, Johannes R

AU - van der Beek, Allard J

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objectives: This systematic review aimed to explore which process variables are used in stress management intervention (SMI) evaluation research.Methods: A systematic review was conducted using seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on an SMI aimed at primary or secondary stress prevention, were directed at paid employees, and reported process data. Two independent researchers checked all records and selected the articles for inclusion. Nielsen and Randall's model for process evaluation was used to cluster the process variables. The three main clusters were context, intervention, and mental models.Results: In the 44 articles included, 47 process variables were found, clustered into three main categories: context (two variables), intervention (31 variables), and mental models (14 variables). Half of the articles contained no reference to process evaluation literature. The collection of process evaluation data mostly took place after the intervention and at the level of the employee.Conclusions: The findings suggest that there is great heterogeneity in methods and process variables used in process evaluations of SMI. This, together with the lack of use of a standardized framework for evaluation, hinders the advancement of process evaluation theory development.

AB - Objectives: This systematic review aimed to explore which process variables are used in stress management intervention (SMI) evaluation research.Methods: A systematic review was conducted using seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on an SMI aimed at primary or secondary stress prevention, were directed at paid employees, and reported process data. Two independent researchers checked all records and selected the articles for inclusion. Nielsen and Randall's model for process evaluation was used to cluster the process variables. The three main clusters were context, intervention, and mental models.Results: In the 44 articles included, 47 process variables were found, clustered into three main categories: context (two variables), intervention (31 variables), and mental models (14 variables). Half of the articles contained no reference to process evaluation literature. The collection of process evaluation data mostly took place after the intervention and at the level of the employee.Conclusions: The findings suggest that there is great heterogeneity in methods and process variables used in process evaluations of SMI. This, together with the lack of use of a standardized framework for evaluation, hinders the advancement of process evaluation theory development.

U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.3570

DO - 10.5271/sjweh.3570

M3 - Article

C2 - 27168469

VL - 42

SP - 371

EP - 381

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health

SN - 0355-3140

IS - 5

ER -