Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions

A literature review

S.T.S. Ghielen, M. van Woerkom, M.C. Meyers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper reviews studies of strengths interventions published between 2011 and 2016. Strengths interventions aim to promote well-being or other positive outcomes by facilitating strengths identification, and sometimes also strengths use and/or development. The present review provides an overview of the different strengths interventions that are investigated, their effectiveness, and moderating and mediating factors. Results of the 18 (quasi-)experimental studies that were identified through a systematic literature search showed that all types of strengths interventions had positive outcomes in terms of well-being, job outcomes (e.g. work engagement), personal growth initiative, and group or team outcomes (e.g. class cohesion). Hope, positive affect, authentic self-expression, perceptions of the employment relationship, and feelings of social worth were identified as mediators, whereas extraversion and having specific strengths (e.g. persistence) were identified as moderators. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and practice.
Keywords: Strengths interventions, positive psychology, well-being, review, positive-activity model
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-585
JournalThe Journal of Positive Psychology
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Non-Randomized Controlled Trials
Extraversion (Psychology)

Keywords

  • BEHAVIOR
  • ENGAGEMENT
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • PSYCHOLOGY INTERVENTIONS
  • SEARCH
  • SELF-EFFICACY
  • Strengths interventions
  • VALIDATION
  • WORK
  • positive psychology
  • positive-activity model
  • review
  • well-being

Cite this

@article{f3550ad8d78849798feae1cc9baf6427,
title = "Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review",
abstract = "This paper reviews studies of strengths interventions published between 2011 and 2016. Strengths interventions aim to promote well-being or other positive outcomes by facilitating strengths identification, and sometimes also strengths use and/or development. The present review provides an overview of the different strengths interventions that are investigated, their effectiveness, and moderating and mediating factors. Results of the 18 (quasi-)experimental studies that were identified through a systematic literature search showed that all types of strengths interventions had positive outcomes in terms of well-being, job outcomes (e.g. work engagement), personal growth initiative, and group or team outcomes (e.g. class cohesion). Hope, positive affect, authentic self-expression, perceptions of the employment relationship, and feelings of social worth were identified as mediators, whereas extraversion and having specific strengths (e.g. persistence) were identified as moderators. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and practice.Keywords: Strengths interventions, positive psychology, well-being, review, positive-activity model",
keywords = "BEHAVIOR, ENGAGEMENT, IDENTIFICATION, PSYCHOLOGY INTERVENTIONS, SEARCH, SELF-EFFICACY, Strengths interventions, VALIDATION, WORK, positive psychology, positive-activity model, review, well-being",
author = "S.T.S. Ghielen and {van Woerkom}, M. and M.C. Meyers",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "573--585",
journal = "The Journal of Positive Psychology",
issn = "1743-9760",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions : A literature review. / Ghielen, S.T.S.; van Woerkom, M.; Meyers, M.C.

In: The Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2018, p. 573-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions

T2 - A literature review

AU - Ghielen, S.T.S.

AU - van Woerkom, M.

AU - Meyers, M.C.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This paper reviews studies of strengths interventions published between 2011 and 2016. Strengths interventions aim to promote well-being or other positive outcomes by facilitating strengths identification, and sometimes also strengths use and/or development. The present review provides an overview of the different strengths interventions that are investigated, their effectiveness, and moderating and mediating factors. Results of the 18 (quasi-)experimental studies that were identified through a systematic literature search showed that all types of strengths interventions had positive outcomes in terms of well-being, job outcomes (e.g. work engagement), personal growth initiative, and group or team outcomes (e.g. class cohesion). Hope, positive affect, authentic self-expression, perceptions of the employment relationship, and feelings of social worth were identified as mediators, whereas extraversion and having specific strengths (e.g. persistence) were identified as moderators. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and practice.Keywords: Strengths interventions, positive psychology, well-being, review, positive-activity model

AB - This paper reviews studies of strengths interventions published between 2011 and 2016. Strengths interventions aim to promote well-being or other positive outcomes by facilitating strengths identification, and sometimes also strengths use and/or development. The present review provides an overview of the different strengths interventions that are investigated, their effectiveness, and moderating and mediating factors. Results of the 18 (quasi-)experimental studies that were identified through a systematic literature search showed that all types of strengths interventions had positive outcomes in terms of well-being, job outcomes (e.g. work engagement), personal growth initiative, and group or team outcomes (e.g. class cohesion). Hope, positive affect, authentic self-expression, perceptions of the employment relationship, and feelings of social worth were identified as mediators, whereas extraversion and having specific strengths (e.g. persistence) were identified as moderators. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and practice.Keywords: Strengths interventions, positive psychology, well-being, review, positive-activity model

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - ENGAGEMENT

KW - IDENTIFICATION

KW - PSYCHOLOGY INTERVENTIONS

KW - SEARCH

KW - SELF-EFFICACY

KW - Strengths interventions

KW - VALIDATION

KW - WORK

KW - positive psychology

KW - positive-activity model

KW - review

KW - well-being

U2 - 10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164

DO - 10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 573

EP - 585

JO - The Journal of Positive Psychology

JF - The Journal of Positive Psychology

SN - 1743-9760

IS - 6

ER -