Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners

Tineke Vandenbroucke, Sileny N Han, Kristel Van Calsteren, Tom F Wilderjans, B.R.H. Van den Bergh, Laurence Claes, Frédéric Amant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objective:

A cancer diagnosis during pregnancy may be considered as an emotional challenge for pregnant women and their partners. We aimed to identify women and partners at risk for high levels of distress based on their coping profile.

Methods:

Sixty-one pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners filled out the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and the newly constructed Cancer and Pregnancy Questionnaire (CPQ). K-means cluster analysis was performed on the CERQ scales. Scores on the CPQ were compared between the women and their partners and between the CERQ-clusters.

Results:

Comparison of women and partners on the CPQ did not reveal significant differences on distress about the child's health, the cancer disease, and the pregnancy or on information satisfaction (P = .16, P = .44, P = .50, and P = .47, respectively). However, women were more inclined to maintain the pregnancy than their partners (P = .011). Three clusters were retrieved based on the CERQ scales, characterized by positive coping, internalizing coping, and blaming. Women and partners using internalizing strategies had significantly higher scores on concerns about the child's health (P = .039), the disease and treatment (P < .001), and the pregnancy and delivery (P = .009) compared with positive and blaming strategies. No cluster differences were found for information satisfaction (P = .71) and tendency to maintain the pregnancy (P = .35).

Conclusion:

Women and partners using internalizing coping strategies deal with the highest levels of distress and may benefit from additional psychosocial support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1215–1221
JournalPsycho-Oncology: Journal of the psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cluster Analysis
Child Health

Cite this

Vandenbroucke, T., Han, S. N., Van Calsteren, K., Wilderjans, T. F., Van den Bergh, B. R. H., Claes, L., & Amant, F. (2017). Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners. Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer, 26(8), 1215–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4301
Vandenbroucke, Tineke ; Han, Sileny N ; Van Calsteren, Kristel ; Wilderjans, Tom F ; Van den Bergh, B.R.H. ; Claes, Laurence ; Amant, Frédéric. / Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners. In: Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 8. pp. 1215–1221.
@article{854eeda2d9fd4f91b48596362ff4389c,
title = "Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners",
abstract = "Objective: A cancer diagnosis during pregnancy may be considered as an emotional challenge for pregnant women and their partners. We aimed to identify women and partners at risk for high levels of distress based on their coping profile.Methods: Sixty-one pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners filled out the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and the newly constructed Cancer and Pregnancy Questionnaire (CPQ). K-means cluster analysis was performed on the CERQ scales. Scores on the CPQ were compared between the women and their partners and between the CERQ-clusters.Results: Comparison of women and partners on the CPQ did not reveal significant differences on distress about the child's health, the cancer disease, and the pregnancy or on information satisfaction (P = .16, P = .44, P = .50, and P = .47, respectively). However, women were more inclined to maintain the pregnancy than their partners (P = .011). Three clusters were retrieved based on the CERQ scales, characterized by positive coping, internalizing coping, and blaming. Women and partners using internalizing strategies had significantly higher scores on concerns about the child's health (P = .039), the disease and treatment (P < .001), and the pregnancy and delivery (P = .009) compared with positive and blaming strategies. No cluster differences were found for information satisfaction (P = .71) and tendency to maintain the pregnancy (P = .35).Conclusion: Women and partners using internalizing coping strategies deal with the highest levels of distress and may benefit from additional psychosocial support.",
author = "Tineke Vandenbroucke and Han, {Sileny N} and {Van Calsteren}, Kristel and Wilderjans, {Tom F} and {Van den Bergh}, B.R.H. and Laurence Claes and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Amant",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/pon.4301",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1215–1221",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "8",

}

Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners. / Vandenbroucke, Tineke; Han, Sileny N; Van Calsteren, Kristel; Wilderjans, Tom F; Van den Bergh, B.R.H.; Claes, Laurence; Amant, Frédéric.

In: Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer, Vol. 26, No. 8, 2017, p. 1215–1221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological distress and cognitive coping in pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners

AU - Vandenbroucke, Tineke

AU - Han, Sileny N

AU - Van Calsteren, Kristel

AU - Wilderjans, Tom F

AU - Van den Bergh, B.R.H.

AU - Claes, Laurence

AU - Amant, Frédéric

N1 - Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: A cancer diagnosis during pregnancy may be considered as an emotional challenge for pregnant women and their partners. We aimed to identify women and partners at risk for high levels of distress based on their coping profile.Methods: Sixty-one pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners filled out the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and the newly constructed Cancer and Pregnancy Questionnaire (CPQ). K-means cluster analysis was performed on the CERQ scales. Scores on the CPQ were compared between the women and their partners and between the CERQ-clusters.Results: Comparison of women and partners on the CPQ did not reveal significant differences on distress about the child's health, the cancer disease, and the pregnancy or on information satisfaction (P = .16, P = .44, P = .50, and P = .47, respectively). However, women were more inclined to maintain the pregnancy than their partners (P = .011). Three clusters were retrieved based on the CERQ scales, characterized by positive coping, internalizing coping, and blaming. Women and partners using internalizing strategies had significantly higher scores on concerns about the child's health (P = .039), the disease and treatment (P < .001), and the pregnancy and delivery (P = .009) compared with positive and blaming strategies. No cluster differences were found for information satisfaction (P = .71) and tendency to maintain the pregnancy (P = .35).Conclusion: Women and partners using internalizing coping strategies deal with the highest levels of distress and may benefit from additional psychosocial support.

AB - Objective: A cancer diagnosis during pregnancy may be considered as an emotional challenge for pregnant women and their partners. We aimed to identify women and partners at risk for high levels of distress based on their coping profile.Methods: Sixty-one pregnant women diagnosed with cancer and their partners filled out the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and the newly constructed Cancer and Pregnancy Questionnaire (CPQ). K-means cluster analysis was performed on the CERQ scales. Scores on the CPQ were compared between the women and their partners and between the CERQ-clusters.Results: Comparison of women and partners on the CPQ did not reveal significant differences on distress about the child's health, the cancer disease, and the pregnancy or on information satisfaction (P = .16, P = .44, P = .50, and P = .47, respectively). However, women were more inclined to maintain the pregnancy than their partners (P = .011). Three clusters were retrieved based on the CERQ scales, characterized by positive coping, internalizing coping, and blaming. Women and partners using internalizing strategies had significantly higher scores on concerns about the child's health (P = .039), the disease and treatment (P < .001), and the pregnancy and delivery (P = .009) compared with positive and blaming strategies. No cluster differences were found for information satisfaction (P = .71) and tendency to maintain the pregnancy (P = .35).Conclusion: Women and partners using internalizing coping strategies deal with the highest levels of distress and may benefit from additional psychosocial support.

U2 - 10.1002/pon.4301

DO - 10.1002/pon.4301

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1215

EP - 1221

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 8

ER -