Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4-to 12-Year-Olds: A Review

Lisanne L. Stone, Roy Otten, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Ad A. Vermulst, Jan M. A. M. Janssens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Since its development, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been widely used in both research and practice. The SDQ screens for positive and negative psychological attributes. This review aims to provide an overview of the psychometric properties of the SDQ for 4- to 12-year-olds. Results from 48 studies (N = 131,223) on reliability and validity of the parent and teacher SDQ are summarized quantitatively and descriptively. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater agreement are satisfactory for the parent and teacher versions. At subscale level, the reliability of the teacher version seemed stronger compared to that of the parent version. Concerning validity, 15 out of 18 studies confirmed the five-factor structure. Correlations with other measures of psychopathology as well as the screening ability of the SDQ are sufficient. This review shows that the psychometric properties of the SDQ are strong, particularly for the teacher version. For practice, this implies that the use of the SDQ as a screening instrument should be continued. Longitudinal research studies should investigate predictive validity. For both practice and research, we emphasize the use of a multi-informant approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-274
Number of pages21
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Parent
  • Reliability
  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
  • Teacher
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4-to 12-Year-Olds: A Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this