Abstract
The authors contend that SSB taxes serve as regulatory measures intended to reduce sugar consumption and address externalities. In comparison with other regulatory non-fiscal tools (total ban/minimum price policy) or fiscal policies (rising VAT rates), excise duties better fit the extra-fiscal goals associated with public health. Consequently, they propose that SSB taxes should be designed as follows: (i) covering all kinds of sugar/sweeteners, avoiding the recourse to a closed list; (ii) levying specific excise taxes in proportion to the sugar content; (iii) ensuring obligatory pass-through of these taxes to consumers; and (iv) earmarking a portion of the revenue to support health programmes and preventive campaigns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 643-681 |
| Number of pages | 60 |
| Journal | World Tax Journal |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Keywords
- Health Taxes
- Sugar Taxation
- SSB Taxation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public health taxes: Should sugar-sweetened beverages be taxed? If so, how?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver