Abstract
Case law from the United Kingdom suggests that the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law has spurred the growth of domestic privacy law at the expense of the rights of the press to free expression and, in line with prior theory, has also granted greater political authority to courts and judges tasked with balancing privacy and expression in domestic legal disputes. These shifts in privacy case law may also suggest that incorporation has increased opportunities for participatory democratic governance by the citizenry, at least through enhanced access to judicial remedies for privacy violations and the enforcement of Convention rights, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |
Publisher | Wiley |
Number of pages | 10 |
Volume | 51 |
Edition | 1 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 2373-9231 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- privacy
- free speech
- expression
- law
- courts
- European court of human rights
- European Convention on Human Rights
- United kingdom
- united states