Public policy and breach of competition law in international arbitration

A competition law practitioner’s viewpoint

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

Abstract

In its March 2016 Opinion in the Genentech case, Advocate General Wathelet raised the complex question of the standard of review that should be applied by domestic courts when asked to set aside or declare unenforceable arbitral awards on the ground that they breach EU competition rules, which in the EU legal order have a public policy nature. Although the Court of Justice of the EU eventually did not take position on this question in its subsequent judgment, Advocate General Wathelet’s Opinion brought once again the complex interface between competition law, arbitration and public policy to the fore.

The objective of this paper is to discuss this interface from a competition law practitioner’s standpoint. The existing literature on the relationship between competition law, arbitration and public policy has been essentially authored by arbitration experts or at least academics or practitioners whose primary area of expertise lies in arbitration. As a result, the existing literature tends to treat competition law in a fairly abstract manner and often fails to sufficiently take into account its objectives, intricacies and the intensely factual analysis its enforcement requires. As a competition law practitioner involved in arbitral proceedings, I attempt to give a competition-law oriented perspective of the questions raised by the interface between arbitration and public policy.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages32
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2016

Publication series

NameTILEC Discussion Papers
Volume2016-029

Fingerprint

arbitration
public policy
Law
EU
legal order
court of justice
expertise
expert

Keywords

  • competition law
  • arbitration
  • public policy
  • New York convention
  • arbitral awards
  • standard of review

Cite this

@techreport{06eb354289044c76808e48b6aeb2a5c9,
title = "Public policy and breach of competition law in international arbitration: A competition law practitioner’s viewpoint",
abstract = "In its March 2016 Opinion in the Genentech case, Advocate General Wathelet raised the complex question of the standard of review that should be applied by domestic courts when asked to set aside or declare unenforceable arbitral awards on the ground that they breach EU competition rules, which in the EU legal order have a public policy nature. Although the Court of Justice of the EU eventually did not take position on this question in its subsequent judgment, Advocate General Wathelet’s Opinion brought once again the complex interface between competition law, arbitration and public policy to the fore. The objective of this paper is to discuss this interface from a competition law practitioner’s standpoint. The existing literature on the relationship between competition law, arbitration and public policy has been essentially authored by arbitration experts or at least academics or practitioners whose primary area of expertise lies in arbitration. As a result, the existing literature tends to treat competition law in a fairly abstract manner and often fails to sufficiently take into account its objectives, intricacies and the intensely factual analysis its enforcement requires. As a competition law practitioner involved in arbitral proceedings, I attempt to give a competition-law oriented perspective of the questions raised by the interface between arbitration and public policy.",
keywords = "competition law, arbitration, public policy, New York convention, arbitral awards, standard of review",
author = "Damien Geradin",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "29",
language = "English",
series = "TILEC Discussion Papers",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Public policy and breach of competition law in international arbitration : A competition law practitioner’s viewpoint. / Geradin, Damien.

2016. (TILEC Discussion Papers; Vol. 2016-029).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Public policy and breach of competition law in international arbitration

T2 - A competition law practitioner’s viewpoint

AU - Geradin, Damien

PY - 2016/5/29

Y1 - 2016/5/29

N2 - In its March 2016 Opinion in the Genentech case, Advocate General Wathelet raised the complex question of the standard of review that should be applied by domestic courts when asked to set aside or declare unenforceable arbitral awards on the ground that they breach EU competition rules, which in the EU legal order have a public policy nature. Although the Court of Justice of the EU eventually did not take position on this question in its subsequent judgment, Advocate General Wathelet’s Opinion brought once again the complex interface between competition law, arbitration and public policy to the fore. The objective of this paper is to discuss this interface from a competition law practitioner’s standpoint. The existing literature on the relationship between competition law, arbitration and public policy has been essentially authored by arbitration experts or at least academics or practitioners whose primary area of expertise lies in arbitration. As a result, the existing literature tends to treat competition law in a fairly abstract manner and often fails to sufficiently take into account its objectives, intricacies and the intensely factual analysis its enforcement requires. As a competition law practitioner involved in arbitral proceedings, I attempt to give a competition-law oriented perspective of the questions raised by the interface between arbitration and public policy.

AB - In its March 2016 Opinion in the Genentech case, Advocate General Wathelet raised the complex question of the standard of review that should be applied by domestic courts when asked to set aside or declare unenforceable arbitral awards on the ground that they breach EU competition rules, which in the EU legal order have a public policy nature. Although the Court of Justice of the EU eventually did not take position on this question in its subsequent judgment, Advocate General Wathelet’s Opinion brought once again the complex interface between competition law, arbitration and public policy to the fore. The objective of this paper is to discuss this interface from a competition law practitioner’s standpoint. The existing literature on the relationship between competition law, arbitration and public policy has been essentially authored by arbitration experts or at least academics or practitioners whose primary area of expertise lies in arbitration. As a result, the existing literature tends to treat competition law in a fairly abstract manner and often fails to sufficiently take into account its objectives, intricacies and the intensely factual analysis its enforcement requires. As a competition law practitioner involved in arbitral proceedings, I attempt to give a competition-law oriented perspective of the questions raised by the interface between arbitration and public policy.

KW - competition law

KW - arbitration

KW - public policy

KW - New York convention

KW - arbitral awards

KW - standard of review

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - TILEC Discussion Papers

BT - Public policy and breach of competition law in international arbitration

ER -