Putting the public back in behavioral public policy

Patricia de Jonge, M. Zeelenberg, Peeter W. J. Verlegh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Behavioral public policies are aimed at influencing the behavior of the public in a way that is advantageous for the public itself and within the law. Sanders, Snijders and Hallsworth (2018 , this issue) summarize the state of the art of this new field of study and introduce a number of challenges and opportunities for the time to come. We address an additional challenge that is present and central in all attempts to influence behavior, namely the public – the people that are the target of behavioral public policies. We review evidence revealing that people do not passively accept those influence attempts, but often show reactant responses. We propose that the Persuasion Knowledge Model provides a framework both to understand the reactions of the public and to facilitate communication between academic researchers and practitioners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-226
JournalBehavioral Public Policy
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

public policy
persuasion
field of study
Law
communication
evidence
time

Cite this

de Jonge, Patricia ; Zeelenberg, M. ; Verlegh, Peeter W. J. / Putting the public back in behavioral public policy. In: Behavioral Public Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 218-226.
@article{da6d2f1b7c49472eb04a034a1252055b,
title = "Putting the public back in behavioral public policy",
abstract = "Behavioral public policies are aimed at influencing the behavior of the public in a way that is advantageous for the public itself and within the law. Sanders, Snijders and Hallsworth (2018 , this issue) summarize the state of the art of this new field of study and introduce a number of challenges and opportunities for the time to come. We address an additional challenge that is present and central in all attempts to influence behavior, namely the public – the people that are the target of behavioral public policies. We review evidence revealing that people do not passively accept those influence attempts, but often show reactant responses. We propose that the Persuasion Knowledge Model provides a framework both to understand the reactions of the public and to facilitate communication between academic researchers and practitioners.",
author = "{de Jonge}, Patricia and M. Zeelenberg and Verlegh, {Peeter W. J.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1017/bpp.2018.23",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "218--226",
journal = "Behavioral Public Policy",
issn = "2398-0648",
publisher = "Cambridge",
number = "2",

}

Putting the public back in behavioral public policy. / de Jonge, Patricia; Zeelenberg, M.; Verlegh, Peeter W. J.

In: Behavioral Public Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2018, p. 218-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting the public back in behavioral public policy

AU - de Jonge, Patricia

AU - Zeelenberg, M.

AU - Verlegh, Peeter W. J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Behavioral public policies are aimed at influencing the behavior of the public in a way that is advantageous for the public itself and within the law. Sanders, Snijders and Hallsworth (2018 , this issue) summarize the state of the art of this new field of study and introduce a number of challenges and opportunities for the time to come. We address an additional challenge that is present and central in all attempts to influence behavior, namely the public – the people that are the target of behavioral public policies. We review evidence revealing that people do not passively accept those influence attempts, but often show reactant responses. We propose that the Persuasion Knowledge Model provides a framework both to understand the reactions of the public and to facilitate communication between academic researchers and practitioners.

AB - Behavioral public policies are aimed at influencing the behavior of the public in a way that is advantageous for the public itself and within the law. Sanders, Snijders and Hallsworth (2018 , this issue) summarize the state of the art of this new field of study and introduce a number of challenges and opportunities for the time to come. We address an additional challenge that is present and central in all attempts to influence behavior, namely the public – the people that are the target of behavioral public policies. We review evidence revealing that people do not passively accept those influence attempts, but often show reactant responses. We propose that the Persuasion Knowledge Model provides a framework both to understand the reactions of the public and to facilitate communication between academic researchers and practitioners.

U2 - 10.1017/bpp.2018.23

DO - 10.1017/bpp.2018.23

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 218

EP - 226

JO - Behavioral Public Policy

JF - Behavioral Public Policy

SN - 2398-0648

IS - 2

ER -