Quine's 'Needlessly Strong' Holism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Quine is routinely perceived as having changed his mind about the scope of the Duhem-Quine thesis, shifting from what has been called an ’extreme holism’ to a more moderate view. Where the Quine of ’Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ argues that “the unit of empirical significance is the whole of science” (1951, 42), the later Quine seems to back away from this “needlessly strong statement of holism” (1991, 393). In this paper, I show that the received view is incorrect. I distinguish three ways in which Quine’s early holism can be said to be wide-scoped and show that he has never changed his mind about any one of these aspects of his early view. Instead, I argue that Quine’s apparent change of mind can be explained away as a mere shift of emphasis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-20
Number of pages9
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A
Volume61
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Holism
Dogma
Pierre Duhem
Empiricism

Cite this

@article{896c8cb4106f4446babb7f8441590cdc,
title = "Quine's 'Needlessly Strong' Holism",
abstract = "Quine is routinely perceived as having changed his mind about the scope of the Duhem-Quine thesis, shifting from what has been called an ’extreme holism’ to a more moderate view. Where the Quine of ’Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ argues that “the unit of empirical significance is the whole of science” (1951, 42), the later Quine seems to back away from this “needlessly strong statement of holism” (1991, 393). In this paper, I show that the received view is incorrect. I distinguish three ways in which Quine’s early holism can be said to be wide-scoped and show that he has never changed his mind about any one of these aspects of his early view. Instead, I argue that Quine’s apparent change of mind can be explained away as a mere shift of emphasis.",
author = "Sander Verhaegh",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "11--20",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Quine's 'Needlessly Strong' Holism. / Verhaegh, Sander.

In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A , Vol. 61, 2017, p. 11-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quine's 'Needlessly Strong' Holism

AU - Verhaegh, Sander

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Quine is routinely perceived as having changed his mind about the scope of the Duhem-Quine thesis, shifting from what has been called an ’extreme holism’ to a more moderate view. Where the Quine of ’Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ argues that “the unit of empirical significance is the whole of science” (1951, 42), the later Quine seems to back away from this “needlessly strong statement of holism” (1991, 393). In this paper, I show that the received view is incorrect. I distinguish three ways in which Quine’s early holism can be said to be wide-scoped and show that he has never changed his mind about any one of these aspects of his early view. Instead, I argue that Quine’s apparent change of mind can be explained away as a mere shift of emphasis.

AB - Quine is routinely perceived as having changed his mind about the scope of the Duhem-Quine thesis, shifting from what has been called an ’extreme holism’ to a more moderate view. Where the Quine of ’Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ argues that “the unit of empirical significance is the whole of science” (1951, 42), the later Quine seems to back away from this “needlessly strong statement of holism” (1991, 393). In this paper, I show that the received view is incorrect. I distinguish three ways in which Quine’s early holism can be said to be wide-scoped and show that he has never changed his mind about any one of these aspects of his early view. Instead, I argue that Quine’s apparent change of mind can be explained away as a mere shift of emphasis.

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 11

EP - 20

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A

SN - 0039-3681

ER -