Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task

Julen Hernandez-Lallement, Marijn van Wingerden, Christine Marx, Milan Srejic, Tobias Kalenscher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Pro-sociality, i.e., the preference for outcomes that produce benefits for other individuals, is ubiquitous in humans. Recently, cross-species comparisons of social behavior have offered important new insights into the evolution of pro-sociality. Here, we present a rodent analog of the Pro-social Choice Task that controls strategic components, de-confounds other-regarding choice motives from the animals' natural tendencies to maximize own food access and directly tests the effect of social context on choice allocation. We trained pairs of rats-an actor and a partner rat-in a double T-maze task where actors decided between two alternatives only differing in the reward delivered to the partner. The "own reward" choice yielded a reward only accessible to the actor whereas the "both reward" choice produced an additional reward for a partner (partner condition) or an inanimate toy (toy Condition), located in an adjacent compartment. We found that actors chose "both reward" at levels above chance and more often in the partner than in the toy condition. Moreover, we show that this choice pattern adapts to the current social context and that the observed behavior is stable over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Hernandez-Lallement, Julen ; van Wingerden, Marijn ; Marx, Christine ; Srejic, Milan ; Kalenscher, Tobias. / Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 8. pp. 443.
@article{bb7d37eecce24ceab182085f67385ab9,
title = "Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task",
abstract = "Pro-sociality, i.e., the preference for outcomes that produce benefits for other individuals, is ubiquitous in humans. Recently, cross-species comparisons of social behavior have offered important new insights into the evolution of pro-sociality. Here, we present a rodent analog of the Pro-social Choice Task that controls strategic components, de-confounds other-regarding choice motives from the animals' natural tendencies to maximize own food access and directly tests the effect of social context on choice allocation. We trained pairs of rats-an actor and a partner rat-in a double T-maze task where actors decided between two alternatives only differing in the reward delivered to the partner. The {"}own reward{"} choice yielded a reward only accessible to the actor whereas the {"}both reward{"} choice produced an additional reward for a partner (partner condition) or an inanimate toy (toy Condition), located in an adjacent compartment. We found that actors chose {"}both reward{"} at levels above chance and more often in the partner than in the toy condition. Moreover, we show that this choice pattern adapts to the current social context and that the observed behavior is stable over time.",
author = "Julen Hernandez-Lallement and {van Wingerden}, Marijn and Christine Marx and Milan Srejic and Tobias Kalenscher",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2014.00443",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "443",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-453X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task. / Hernandez-Lallement, Julen; van Wingerden, Marijn; Marx, Christine; Srejic, Milan; Kalenscher, Tobias.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 8, 2014, p. 443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task

AU - Hernandez-Lallement, Julen

AU - van Wingerden, Marijn

AU - Marx, Christine

AU - Srejic, Milan

AU - Kalenscher, Tobias

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Pro-sociality, i.e., the preference for outcomes that produce benefits for other individuals, is ubiquitous in humans. Recently, cross-species comparisons of social behavior have offered important new insights into the evolution of pro-sociality. Here, we present a rodent analog of the Pro-social Choice Task that controls strategic components, de-confounds other-regarding choice motives from the animals' natural tendencies to maximize own food access and directly tests the effect of social context on choice allocation. We trained pairs of rats-an actor and a partner rat-in a double T-maze task where actors decided between two alternatives only differing in the reward delivered to the partner. The "own reward" choice yielded a reward only accessible to the actor whereas the "both reward" choice produced an additional reward for a partner (partner condition) or an inanimate toy (toy Condition), located in an adjacent compartment. We found that actors chose "both reward" at levels above chance and more often in the partner than in the toy condition. Moreover, we show that this choice pattern adapts to the current social context and that the observed behavior is stable over time.

AB - Pro-sociality, i.e., the preference for outcomes that produce benefits for other individuals, is ubiquitous in humans. Recently, cross-species comparisons of social behavior have offered important new insights into the evolution of pro-sociality. Here, we present a rodent analog of the Pro-social Choice Task that controls strategic components, de-confounds other-regarding choice motives from the animals' natural tendencies to maximize own food access and directly tests the effect of social context on choice allocation. We trained pairs of rats-an actor and a partner rat-in a double T-maze task where actors decided between two alternatives only differing in the reward delivered to the partner. The "own reward" choice yielded a reward only accessible to the actor whereas the "both reward" choice produced an additional reward for a partner (partner condition) or an inanimate toy (toy Condition), located in an adjacent compartment. We found that actors chose "both reward" at levels above chance and more often in the partner than in the toy condition. Moreover, we show that this choice pattern adapts to the current social context and that the observed behavior is stable over time.

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00443

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00443

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 443

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-453X

ER -