Reactions to claimed and granted overinclusion

Extending research on the effects of claimball versus cyberball

Wendy De Waal-andrews, Ilja Van Beest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social outcomes can result both from people’s own behavior (claim process) and from the behavior of others (grant process). Prior research compared the effect of these two processes on people’s experience of inclusion and outperformance, using two virtual ball-toss games: claimball and cyberball. We extend this work by using the same games to assess reactions to a third social outcome, overinclusion. Participants obtained the majority of the ball-tosses (overinclusion) or almost no ball-tosses (ostracism) in claimball or cyberball. Results showed that (1) overinclusion was more satisfying than ostracism, (2) especially when granted by others and less so when claimed for oneself. These results advance knowledge about people’s experience of social outcomes, depending on the processes leading to them.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalThe Journal of Social Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

Knowledge of Results (Psychology)

Keywords

  • DOMINANCE
  • INCLUSION
  • OSTRACISM
  • OTHERS
  • PRESTIGE
  • Social outcomes
  • claimball
  • cyberball
  • inclusion
  • ostracism
  • overinclusion

Cite this

@article{3d9ce223ef354b70b55e04c838ab6b8e,
title = "Reactions to claimed and granted overinclusion: Extending research on the effects of claimball versus cyberball",
abstract = "Social outcomes can result both from people’s own behavior (claim process) and from the behavior of others (grant process). Prior research compared the effect of these two processes on people’s experience of inclusion and outperformance, using two virtual ball-toss games: claimball and cyberball. We extend this work by using the same games to assess reactions to a third social outcome, overinclusion. Participants obtained the majority of the ball-tosses (overinclusion) or almost no ball-tosses (ostracism) in claimball or cyberball. Results showed that (1) overinclusion was more satisfying than ostracism, (2) especially when granted by others and less so when claimed for oneself. These results advance knowledge about people’s experience of social outcomes, depending on the processes leading to them.",
keywords = "DOMINANCE, INCLUSION, OSTRACISM, OTHERS, PRESTIGE, Social outcomes, claimball, cyberball, inclusion, ostracism, overinclusion",
author = "{De Waal-andrews}, Wendy and {Van Beest}, Ilja",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.2019.1610348",
language = "English",
journal = "The Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Reactions to claimed and granted overinclusion : Extending research on the effects of claimball versus cyberball. / De Waal-andrews, Wendy; Van Beest, Ilja.

In: The Journal of Social Psychology, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactions to claimed and granted overinclusion

T2 - Extending research on the effects of claimball versus cyberball

AU - De Waal-andrews, Wendy

AU - Van Beest, Ilja

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Social outcomes can result both from people’s own behavior (claim process) and from the behavior of others (grant process). Prior research compared the effect of these two processes on people’s experience of inclusion and outperformance, using two virtual ball-toss games: claimball and cyberball. We extend this work by using the same games to assess reactions to a third social outcome, overinclusion. Participants obtained the majority of the ball-tosses (overinclusion) or almost no ball-tosses (ostracism) in claimball or cyberball. Results showed that (1) overinclusion was more satisfying than ostracism, (2) especially when granted by others and less so when claimed for oneself. These results advance knowledge about people’s experience of social outcomes, depending on the processes leading to them.

AB - Social outcomes can result both from people’s own behavior (claim process) and from the behavior of others (grant process). Prior research compared the effect of these two processes on people’s experience of inclusion and outperformance, using two virtual ball-toss games: claimball and cyberball. We extend this work by using the same games to assess reactions to a third social outcome, overinclusion. Participants obtained the majority of the ball-tosses (overinclusion) or almost no ball-tosses (ostracism) in claimball or cyberball. Results showed that (1) overinclusion was more satisfying than ostracism, (2) especially when granted by others and less so when claimed for oneself. These results advance knowledge about people’s experience of social outcomes, depending on the processes leading to them.

KW - DOMINANCE

KW - INCLUSION

KW - OSTRACISM

KW - OTHERS

KW - PRESTIGE

KW - Social outcomes

KW - claimball

KW - cyberball

KW - inclusion

KW - ostracism

KW - overinclusion

UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F00224545.2019.1610348

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.2019.1610348

DO - 10.1080/00224545.2019.1610348

M3 - Article

JO - The Journal of Social Psychology

JF - The Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

ER -