Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets

Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion?

Christoph Kogler*, Anton Kuehberger, Rainer Gilhofer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The endowment effect is the finding that possession of an item adds to its value. We introduce a new procedure for testing this effect: participants are divided into two groups. Possession group participants inspect a numbered lottery ticket and know it is theirs, while inspection group participants only inspect a lottery ticket without being endowed with it. Subsequently participants choose between playing the lottery with this (possessed or inspected) ticket, or exchanging it for another one. Our procedure tests for the effect of endowment while controlling for the influence of transaction costs as well as for inspection effects and the influence of bargaining roles (buyer vs. seller), which often afflict experimentation with the endowment effect. In a real setting, tickets in possession were valued significantly higher than inspected tickets. Contrary to some findings in the literature participants also correctly predicted these valuation differences in a hypothetical situation, both for themselves as well as for others. Furthermore, our results suggest that regret rather than loss aversion may be the source of the endowment effect in an experimental setting using lottery tickets. Applying our procedure to a setting employing riskless objects in form of mugs revealed rather ambiguous results, thus emphasizing that the role of regret might be less prominent in non-lottery settings. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-53
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Endowment effect
  • Ownership
  • Prediction
  • Regret
  • Simulation
  • PROSPECT-THEORY
  • DECISION
  • CHOICE
  • UNCERTAINTY
  • PSYCHOLOGY
  • MODELS
  • DISAPPOINTMENT
  • PREFERENCES
  • RELUCTANT
  • UTILITY

Cite this

@article{dc8c8048777e4875a361a3ad2c108521,
title = "Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets: Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion?",
abstract = "The endowment effect is the finding that possession of an item adds to its value. We introduce a new procedure for testing this effect: participants are divided into two groups. Possession group participants inspect a numbered lottery ticket and know it is theirs, while inspection group participants only inspect a lottery ticket without being endowed with it. Subsequently participants choose between playing the lottery with this (possessed or inspected) ticket, or exchanging it for another one. Our procedure tests for the effect of endowment while controlling for the influence of transaction costs as well as for inspection effects and the influence of bargaining roles (buyer vs. seller), which often afflict experimentation with the endowment effect. In a real setting, tickets in possession were valued significantly higher than inspected tickets. Contrary to some findings in the literature participants also correctly predicted these valuation differences in a hypothetical situation, both for themselves as well as for others. Furthermore, our results suggest that regret rather than loss aversion may be the source of the endowment effect in an experimental setting using lottery tickets. Applying our procedure to a setting employing riskless objects in form of mugs revealed rather ambiguous results, thus emphasizing that the role of regret might be less prominent in non-lottery settings. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Endowment effect, Ownership, Prediction, Regret, Simulation, PROSPECT-THEORY, DECISION, CHOICE, UNCERTAINTY, PSYCHOLOGY, MODELS, DISAPPOINTMENT, PREFERENCES, RELUCTANT, UTILITY",
author = "Christoph Kogler and Anton Kuehberger and Rainer Gilhofer",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "42--53",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets : Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion? / Kogler, Christoph; Kuehberger, Anton; Gilhofer, Rainer.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 37, 08.2013, p. 42-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets

T2 - Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion?

AU - Kogler, Christoph

AU - Kuehberger, Anton

AU - Gilhofer, Rainer

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The endowment effect is the finding that possession of an item adds to its value. We introduce a new procedure for testing this effect: participants are divided into two groups. Possession group participants inspect a numbered lottery ticket and know it is theirs, while inspection group participants only inspect a lottery ticket without being endowed with it. Subsequently participants choose between playing the lottery with this (possessed or inspected) ticket, or exchanging it for another one. Our procedure tests for the effect of endowment while controlling for the influence of transaction costs as well as for inspection effects and the influence of bargaining roles (buyer vs. seller), which often afflict experimentation with the endowment effect. In a real setting, tickets in possession were valued significantly higher than inspected tickets. Contrary to some findings in the literature participants also correctly predicted these valuation differences in a hypothetical situation, both for themselves as well as for others. Furthermore, our results suggest that regret rather than loss aversion may be the source of the endowment effect in an experimental setting using lottery tickets. Applying our procedure to a setting employing riskless objects in form of mugs revealed rather ambiguous results, thus emphasizing that the role of regret might be less prominent in non-lottery settings. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - The endowment effect is the finding that possession of an item adds to its value. We introduce a new procedure for testing this effect: participants are divided into two groups. Possession group participants inspect a numbered lottery ticket and know it is theirs, while inspection group participants only inspect a lottery ticket without being endowed with it. Subsequently participants choose between playing the lottery with this (possessed or inspected) ticket, or exchanging it for another one. Our procedure tests for the effect of endowment while controlling for the influence of transaction costs as well as for inspection effects and the influence of bargaining roles (buyer vs. seller), which often afflict experimentation with the endowment effect. In a real setting, tickets in possession were valued significantly higher than inspected tickets. Contrary to some findings in the literature participants also correctly predicted these valuation differences in a hypothetical situation, both for themselves as well as for others. Furthermore, our results suggest that regret rather than loss aversion may be the source of the endowment effect in an experimental setting using lottery tickets. Applying our procedure to a setting employing riskless objects in form of mugs revealed rather ambiguous results, thus emphasizing that the role of regret might be less prominent in non-lottery settings. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Endowment effect

KW - Ownership

KW - Prediction

KW - Regret

KW - Simulation

KW - PROSPECT-THEORY

KW - DECISION

KW - CHOICE

KW - UNCERTAINTY

KW - PSYCHOLOGY

KW - MODELS

KW - DISAPPOINTMENT

KW - PREFERENCES

KW - RELUCTANT

KW - UTILITY

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 42

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

ER -