Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly

Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage

G. Pawlina, P.M. Kort

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

292 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper considers the impact of investment cost asymmetry on the value and optimal real option exercise strategies of firms under imperfect competition.Both firms have an opportunity to invest in a project enhancing (ceteris paribus) the profit now.We show that three types of equilibria exist and derive critical levels of cost asymmetry separating the regions in which they prevail.The presence of strategic interactions leads to counter-intuitive results.First, depending on the level of asymmetry, a marginal increase in the investment cost of the firm with the cost disadvantage can increase this firm's own value.Second, such a cost increase can result in a decrease in value of the competitor.Moreover, we discuss the welfare implications of the optimal exercise strategies and show that the presence of identical firms can result in a socially less desirable outcome than if one of the competitors has a significant investment cost disadvantage.Finally, we prove that profit uncertainty always delays investment, even in the presence of a strategic option of becoming the first investor.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherFinance
Number of pages33
Volume2001-95
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2001-95

Fingerprint

Real options
Disadvantage
Duopoly
Costs
Competitors
Cost asymmetry
Exercise
Profit
Uncertainty
Investors
Asymmetry
Ceteris paribus
Welfare implications
Firm value
Imperfect competition
Strategic options
Strategic interaction

Keywords

  • options
  • duopoly
  • capital budgeting
  • social welfare
  • investment

Cite this

Pawlina, G., & Kort, P. M. (2001). Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-95). Tilburg: Finance.
Pawlina, G. ; Kort, P.M. / Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly : Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage. Tilburg : Finance, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{e997e0f63d0f4cbeb97ac266e541078d,
title = "Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage",
abstract = "This paper considers the impact of investment cost asymmetry on the value and optimal real option exercise strategies of firms under imperfect competition.Both firms have an opportunity to invest in a project enhancing (ceteris paribus) the profit now.We show that three types of equilibria exist and derive critical levels of cost asymmetry separating the regions in which they prevail.The presence of strategic interactions leads to counter-intuitive results.First, depending on the level of asymmetry, a marginal increase in the investment cost of the firm with the cost disadvantage can increase this firm's own value.Second, such a cost increase can result in a decrease in value of the competitor.Moreover, we discuss the welfare implications of the optimal exercise strategies and show that the presence of identical firms can result in a socially less desirable outcome than if one of the competitors has a significant investment cost disadvantage.Finally, we prove that profit uncertainty always delays investment, even in the presence of a strategic option of becoming the first investor.",
keywords = "options, duopoly, capital budgeting, social welfare, investment",
author = "G. Pawlina and P.M. Kort",
note = "Pagination: 33",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "2001-95",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Finance",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Finance",

}

Pawlina, G & Kort, PM 2001 'Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2001-95, Finance, Tilburg.

Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly : Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage. / Pawlina, G.; Kort, P.M.

Tilburg : Finance, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-95).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly

T2 - Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage

AU - Pawlina, G.

AU - Kort, P.M.

N1 - Pagination: 33

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This paper considers the impact of investment cost asymmetry on the value and optimal real option exercise strategies of firms under imperfect competition.Both firms have an opportunity to invest in a project enhancing (ceteris paribus) the profit now.We show that three types of equilibria exist and derive critical levels of cost asymmetry separating the regions in which they prevail.The presence of strategic interactions leads to counter-intuitive results.First, depending on the level of asymmetry, a marginal increase in the investment cost of the firm with the cost disadvantage can increase this firm's own value.Second, such a cost increase can result in a decrease in value of the competitor.Moreover, we discuss the welfare implications of the optimal exercise strategies and show that the presence of identical firms can result in a socially less desirable outcome than if one of the competitors has a significant investment cost disadvantage.Finally, we prove that profit uncertainty always delays investment, even in the presence of a strategic option of becoming the first investor.

AB - This paper considers the impact of investment cost asymmetry on the value and optimal real option exercise strategies of firms under imperfect competition.Both firms have an opportunity to invest in a project enhancing (ceteris paribus) the profit now.We show that three types of equilibria exist and derive critical levels of cost asymmetry separating the regions in which they prevail.The presence of strategic interactions leads to counter-intuitive results.First, depending on the level of asymmetry, a marginal increase in the investment cost of the firm with the cost disadvantage can increase this firm's own value.Second, such a cost increase can result in a decrease in value of the competitor.Moreover, we discuss the welfare implications of the optimal exercise strategies and show that the presence of identical firms can result in a socially less desirable outcome than if one of the competitors has a significant investment cost disadvantage.Finally, we prove that profit uncertainty always delays investment, even in the presence of a strategic option of becoming the first investor.

KW - options

KW - duopoly

KW - capital budgeting

KW - social welfare

KW - investment

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2001-95

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly

PB - Finance

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Pawlina G, Kort PM. Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage. Tilburg: Finance. 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).