Receiving credit: On delegation and responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Evidence has shown that blame for a “bad” decision can be shifted by delegating the decision to someone else. We conduct experiments using a four-player delegated dictator game to examine whether the reverse is also true: does one receive credit for taking a “good” decision as compared to delegating the decision to someone else? Our results indicate that the answer is affirmative. A person receives higher rewards when she makes a fair decision herself than when a delegate does. This indicates that responsibility attribution is a double-edged sword that applies to both bad and good outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104522
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume158
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Keywords

  • delegation
  • reward
  • responsibility attribution
  • experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Receiving credit: On delegation and responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this