Abstract
Evidence has shown that blame for a “bad” decision can be shifted by delegating the decision to someone else. We conduct experiments using a four-player delegated dictator game to examine whether the reverse is also true: does one receive credit for taking a “good” decision as compared to delegating the decision to someone else? Our results indicate that the answer is affirmative. A person receives higher rewards when she makes a fair decision herself than when a delegate does. This indicates that responsibility attribution is a double-edged sword that applies to both bad and good outcomes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104522 |
Journal | European Economic Review |
Volume | 158 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Keywords
- delegation
- reward
- responsibility attribution
- experiment