TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing red tape’s negative consequences for leaders
T2 - The buffering role of autonomous motivation
AU - Muylaert, Jolien
AU - Bauwens, Robin
AU - Audenaert, Mieke
AU - Decramer, Adelien
N1 - Funding
This study was funded by Research Foundation Flanders (grant number 11H1220N).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In a context where the amount of red tape in healthcare organizations continues to rise, head nurses’ job satisfaction is constantly under pressure. By building on the Job Demands-Resources model, we developed a theoretical model investigating the relationship between red tape and job satisfaction. By investigating the mediating role of discretionary room and the moderating role of autonomous motivation in this relationship, this study does not only aim to provide additional knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms in this relationship, but also to increase our understanding of how this suffering at work can be mitigated. Our conditional process analyses (N = 277 head nurses) indicate that red tape undermines head nurses’ job satisfaction and that discretionary room acts as an underlying mechanism in this process. By revealing the mediating role of discretionary room, this study advances our understanding of the risks originating from red tape for leaders. Furthermore, our findings also indicate that autonomous motivation mitigates the negative relation between red tape and discretionary room and between red tape and job satisfaction. As autonomous motivation turns out to be an important protection mechanism against the negative consequences of red tape, organizations should put extra effort into stimulating the autonomous motivation of their leaders. When organizations make sure that their leaders’ job designs and work environments meet the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, leaders will become more autonomously motivated, which will buffer the negative impact of red tape.
AB - In a context where the amount of red tape in healthcare organizations continues to rise, head nurses’ job satisfaction is constantly under pressure. By building on the Job Demands-Resources model, we developed a theoretical model investigating the relationship between red tape and job satisfaction. By investigating the mediating role of discretionary room and the moderating role of autonomous motivation in this relationship, this study does not only aim to provide additional knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms in this relationship, but also to increase our understanding of how this suffering at work can be mitigated. Our conditional process analyses (N = 277 head nurses) indicate that red tape undermines head nurses’ job satisfaction and that discretionary room acts as an underlying mechanism in this process. By revealing the mediating role of discretionary room, this study advances our understanding of the risks originating from red tape for leaders. Furthermore, our findings also indicate that autonomous motivation mitigates the negative relation between red tape and discretionary room and between red tape and job satisfaction. As autonomous motivation turns out to be an important protection mechanism against the negative consequences of red tape, organizations should put extra effort into stimulating the autonomous motivation of their leaders. When organizations make sure that their leaders’ job designs and work environments meet the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, leaders will become more autonomously motivated, which will buffer the negative impact of red tape.
KW - EMPLOYEES
KW - INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - MEDIATING ROLE
KW - METHOD BIAS
KW - NEED SATISFACTION
KW - NURSES JOB-SATISFACTION
KW - ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT
KW - SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
KW - WORK
KW - administrative burden
KW - autonomous motivation
KW - discretionary room
KW - elderly care homes
KW - head nurses
KW - job satisfaction
KW - red tape
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123777932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.806388
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.806388
M3 - Article
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 806388
ER -