TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing social desirability bias via item randomized response
T2 - An application to measure underreported desires
AU - de Jong, M.G.
AU - Pieters, R.
AU - Fox, J.P.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The authors present a polytomous item randomized response model to measure socially sensitive consumer behavior. It complements established methods in marketing to correct for social desirability bias a posteriori and traditional randomized response models to prevent social desirability bias a priori. The model allows for individual-level inferences at the construct level while protecting the privacy of respondents at the item level. In addition, it is possible to incorporate covariates into various parts of the model. The proposed method is especially useful to study social issues in marketing. In the empirical application, the authors use a two-group experimental survey design and find that with the new procedure, participants report their sensitive desires more truthfully, with significant differences between socioeconomic groups. In addition, the method performs better than methods based on social desirability scales. Finally, the authors discuss truthfulness in data collection and confidentiality in data utilization.
AB - The authors present a polytomous item randomized response model to measure socially sensitive consumer behavior. It complements established methods in marketing to correct for social desirability bias a posteriori and traditional randomized response models to prevent social desirability bias a priori. The model allows for individual-level inferences at the construct level while protecting the privacy of respondents at the item level. In addition, it is possible to incorporate covariates into various parts of the model. The proposed method is especially useful to study social issues in marketing. In the empirical application, the authors use a two-group experimental survey design and find that with the new procedure, participants report their sensitive desires more truthfully, with significant differences between socioeconomic groups. In addition, the method performs better than methods based on social desirability scales. Finally, the authors discuss truthfulness in data collection and confidentiality in data utilization.
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-2437
VL - 47
SP - 14
EP - 27
JO - Journal of Marketing Research
JF - Journal of Marketing Research
IS - 1
ER -