Relationships as Commitment Devices

Strategic Silence

A. Nir

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    242 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    People who understand self-control problems can devise mechanisms to overcome them.In this paper, we discuss how relationships can help individuals overcome their selfcontrol problems by creating a tradeoff between desired present procrastination and undesired future procrastination.Threatening not to speak to a person who caves in can create such a tradeoff.The results depend on a limited memory assumption.We show how such interactions can explain strategic pretence, strategic ignorance, why a person would choose to punish himself after he caved in and why punishments need to increase if not adhered to immediately.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationTilburg
    PublisherMicroeconomics
    Number of pages33
    Volume2004-49
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Publication series

    NameCentER Discussion Paper
    Volume2004-49

    Fingerprint

    Self-control
    Procrastination
    Trade-offs
    Punishment
    Ignorance
    Interaction

    Keywords

    • strategy
    • bias
    • behavioural science

    Cite this

    Nir, A. (2004). Relationships as Commitment Devices: Strategic Silence. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2004-49). Tilburg: Microeconomics.
    Nir, A. / Relationships as Commitment Devices : Strategic Silence. Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2004. (CentER Discussion Paper).
    @techreport{073fb830048b435e80d2c2d049caff6a,
    title = "Relationships as Commitment Devices: Strategic Silence",
    abstract = "People who understand self-control problems can devise mechanisms to overcome them.In this paper, we discuss how relationships can help individuals overcome their selfcontrol problems by creating a tradeoff between desired present procrastination and undesired future procrastination.Threatening not to speak to a person who caves in can create such a tradeoff.The results depend on a limited memory assumption.We show how such interactions can explain strategic pretence, strategic ignorance, why a person would choose to punish himself after he caved in and why punishments need to increase if not adhered to immediately.",
    keywords = "strategy, bias, behavioural science",
    author = "A. Nir",
    note = "Pagination: 33",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2004-49",
    series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
    publisher = "Microeconomics",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Microeconomics",

    }

    Nir, A 2004 'Relationships as Commitment Devices: Strategic Silence' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2004-49, Microeconomics, Tilburg.

    Relationships as Commitment Devices : Strategic Silence. / Nir, A.

    Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2004. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2004-49).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Relationships as Commitment Devices

    T2 - Strategic Silence

    AU - Nir, A.

    N1 - Pagination: 33

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - People who understand self-control problems can devise mechanisms to overcome them.In this paper, we discuss how relationships can help individuals overcome their selfcontrol problems by creating a tradeoff between desired present procrastination and undesired future procrastination.Threatening not to speak to a person who caves in can create such a tradeoff.The results depend on a limited memory assumption.We show how such interactions can explain strategic pretence, strategic ignorance, why a person would choose to punish himself after he caved in and why punishments need to increase if not adhered to immediately.

    AB - People who understand self-control problems can devise mechanisms to overcome them.In this paper, we discuss how relationships can help individuals overcome their selfcontrol problems by creating a tradeoff between desired present procrastination and undesired future procrastination.Threatening not to speak to a person who caves in can create such a tradeoff.The results depend on a limited memory assumption.We show how such interactions can explain strategic pretence, strategic ignorance, why a person would choose to punish himself after he caved in and why punishments need to increase if not adhered to immediately.

    KW - strategy

    KW - bias

    KW - behavioural science

    M3 - Discussion paper

    VL - 2004-49

    T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

    BT - Relationships as Commitment Devices

    PB - Microeconomics

    CY - Tilburg

    ER -

    Nir A. Relationships as Commitment Devices: Strategic Silence. Tilburg: Microeconomics. 2004. (CentER Discussion Paper).