Religious Insights in the Public Debate: A Tribute to Hendrik M. Vroom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this tribute to Henk Vroom, Peter Jonkers discusses a topic both he and Vroom were very interested in: religious insights in the public debate. In this article Jonkers first explores the current situation of religiosity in the West, which can be typified as individualized religiosity. He then argues that this religiosity cannot rely on a tradition of reasonable debate and critical self-reflection, which jeopardizes public debate. These developments have certain effects on the nature of religious insights and the public debate at large. Jonkers develops Vroom’s notion of dialogical pluralism to investigate these effects. He examines the question whether the idea of (religious) wisdom can offer (new) common ground for this dialogue and argues that this idea is not as ‘solid’ as the reasoned truth claims of the established religious traditions, that it rests on a broader and less procedural idea of reason than the secular type of rationality that dominate political liberalism, and that it does more justice to the narrative, local, and fragmented character of the individualized religiosity of our times than traditional (religious and secular) doctrine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-36
Number of pages18
JournalStudies in Interreligious Dialogue
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Religion
Religiosity
Public Debate
Rationality
Religious Traditions
Pluralism
Self-reflection
Political Liberalism
Justice
Wisdom
Procedural
Doctrine

Cite this

@article{f6c1387a4bb0408991d740137d9cc591,
title = "Religious Insights in the Public Debate: A Tribute to Hendrik M. Vroom",
abstract = "In this tribute to Henk Vroom, Peter Jonkers discusses a topic both he and Vroom were very interested in: religious insights in the public debate. In this article Jonkers first explores the current situation of religiosity in the West, which can be typified as individualized religiosity. He then argues that this religiosity cannot rely on a tradition of reasonable debate and critical self-reflection, which jeopardizes public debate. These developments have certain effects on the nature of religious insights and the public debate at large. Jonkers develops Vroom’s notion of dialogical pluralism to investigate these effects. He examines the question whether the idea of (religious) wisdom can offer (new) common ground for this dialogue and argues that this idea is not as ‘solid’ as the reasoned truth claims of the established religious traditions, that it rests on a broader and less procedural idea of reason than the secular type of rationality that dominate political liberalism, and that it does more justice to the narrative, local, and fragmented character of the individualized religiosity of our times than traditional (religious and secular) doctrine.",
author = "Peter Jonkers",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.2143/SID.25.1.3112879",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "19--36",
journal = "Studies in Interreligious Dialogue",
issn = "0926-2326",
publisher = "Peeters Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Religious Insights in the Public Debate : A Tribute to Hendrik M. Vroom. / Jonkers, Peter.

In: Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, Vol. 25, No. 1, 30.06.2015, p. 19-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religious Insights in the Public Debate

T2 - A Tribute to Hendrik M. Vroom

AU - Jonkers, Peter

PY - 2015/6/30

Y1 - 2015/6/30

N2 - In this tribute to Henk Vroom, Peter Jonkers discusses a topic both he and Vroom were very interested in: religious insights in the public debate. In this article Jonkers first explores the current situation of religiosity in the West, which can be typified as individualized religiosity. He then argues that this religiosity cannot rely on a tradition of reasonable debate and critical self-reflection, which jeopardizes public debate. These developments have certain effects on the nature of religious insights and the public debate at large. Jonkers develops Vroom’s notion of dialogical pluralism to investigate these effects. He examines the question whether the idea of (religious) wisdom can offer (new) common ground for this dialogue and argues that this idea is not as ‘solid’ as the reasoned truth claims of the established religious traditions, that it rests on a broader and less procedural idea of reason than the secular type of rationality that dominate political liberalism, and that it does more justice to the narrative, local, and fragmented character of the individualized religiosity of our times than traditional (religious and secular) doctrine.

AB - In this tribute to Henk Vroom, Peter Jonkers discusses a topic both he and Vroom were very interested in: religious insights in the public debate. In this article Jonkers first explores the current situation of religiosity in the West, which can be typified as individualized religiosity. He then argues that this religiosity cannot rely on a tradition of reasonable debate and critical self-reflection, which jeopardizes public debate. These developments have certain effects on the nature of religious insights and the public debate at large. Jonkers develops Vroom’s notion of dialogical pluralism to investigate these effects. He examines the question whether the idea of (religious) wisdom can offer (new) common ground for this dialogue and argues that this idea is not as ‘solid’ as the reasoned truth claims of the established religious traditions, that it rests on a broader and less procedural idea of reason than the secular type of rationality that dominate political liberalism, and that it does more justice to the narrative, local, and fragmented character of the individualized religiosity of our times than traditional (religious and secular) doctrine.

U2 - 10.2143/SID.25.1.3112879

DO - 10.2143/SID.25.1.3112879

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 19

EP - 36

JO - Studies in Interreligious Dialogue

JF - Studies in Interreligious Dialogue

SN - 0926-2326

IS - 1

ER -